Look at their definition for slipknot. How biased :pinch:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slipknot_%28band%29
Printable View
Look at their definition for slipknot. How biased :pinch:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slipknot_%28band%29
:glag: I can't be arsed to read any of it, but I'm sure it's hilarious.
seems pretty fair to me. why exactly do you think its biased in some way?
it defines slipknot as mallcore, which is really opinionated.
I don't see the bias you speak of, but I shouldn't worry if I were you; wikipedia is not history, after all.Quote:
Originally Posted by Formula1
Time will take care of your concerns, certainly.
Well the article doesn't hold up to the "Neutral Point of View (NPOV)" of Wikipedia.org
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Npov
I once read anrticle stating how wikipedia has been losing credibility in its entries, due to issues similar ones like these.
Sure. Accusing someone of being part of a conspiracy to assassinate the president of the U.S.A and branding Slipknot a mallcore band definitely is in the same league.Quote:
Originally Posted by Formula1
I agree. A whole article and no mention that all their songs are just covers of spice girls records.Quote:
Originally Posted by Formula1
i read it, it does seem like a very bias opinion, but to be fair, slipknot do suck bawls:dabs:
I've heard the same.Quote:
Originally Posted by Formula1
Why do you use Wikipedia?