You British are indeed audacious

First you place in your capitals centre, Trafalgar square, A statue of a handicapped naked, pregnant woman with no arms

http://img83.imageshack.us/img83/4478/16vw1.jpg

more info - http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/e...on/4247000.stm

and then you depict one of your countries greatest heroes in a straightjacket.
Churchill - http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/4795832.stm

http://img83.imageshack.us/img83/967...atue2031za.jpg

I bow down to your updated cultural boldness.
Im not saying they are "great" works but you are definetly the first to steer away from conservative cliche's and bring the noob art to 2006.
Hopefully other countries will learn from this.
Cheers

she also has one leg, which is kinda hawt

except for the whole, some man hass put his seed in her bush for life. which kinda puts me off.

remember, pigeons are genetically designed to shit on sculptures to for the sake of all those that don't like them.

is it me or does her big toe look more like a thumb.

is it just me, or does her arm look like an arse crack?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by 100%

First you place in your capitals centre, Trafalgar square, A statue of a handicapped naked, pregnant woman with no arms

http://img83.imageshack.us/img83/4478/16vw1.jpg

---

Isn't it just a rip-off of the Venus De Milo?

http://www.ihistory101.net/espanol/g...us-de-milo.jpg

ahh the wonderdrug thalidamide

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Proper Bo

is it just me, or does her arm look like an arse crack?

---

Whatever turns you on...

Quote:

---

Isn't it just a rip-off of the Venus De Milo?

---

subconciously maybe but DeMilo had her arms removed after becoming a statue, the woman portrayed in the new work had no arms at birth

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by 15%

DeMilo had her arms removed after becoming a statue

---

I didn't realize she actually became a statue then lost her arms. I assumed that it was a sculpture of her.