America with the funny looking president would win
sides, we can just nuke you guys and its like :gameover:
Printable View
America with the funny looking president would win
sides, we can just nuke you guys and its like :gameover:
This is Lounge material but America would win. However, we shouldn't discount the brat terrorist. They are better at doing American accents than we are doing there's and just imagine the hard-to-identify and ubiquitous Caucasian terrorist.Quote:
Originally Posted by BrolyBoo
We'd be doomed fer sher loike.
Other than that, our military is stronger, our country is bigger, and we have more nukes and other shit at our disposal.
Agreed, with both of the above.Quote:
Originally Posted by Busyman™This is Lounge material but America would win. However, we shouldn't discount the brat terrorist. They are better at doing American accents than we are doing there's and just imagine the hard-to-identify and ubiquitous Caucasian terrorist.Quote:
Originally Posted by BrolyBoo
We'd be doomed fer sher loike.
Other than that, our military is stronger, our country is bigger, and we have more nukes and other shit at our disposal.
Pfft, please think about it
we friggin america
we could take on the world and still be alive
like, we could make britian the new Iraq
btw, we could shoot nukes out the skies, so if you guys use all your nukes on us, we blast those shits out da sky and blow YOUR shit up and attack
Many countries have anti-ballistic missiles. We just have more of them...maybe (Russia). Those type of missiles are far from perfect also.Quote:
Originally Posted by BrolyBoo
We could not take on the world and still be alive. Keep in mind that some of our buildings were collapsed with the people still inside them in New York. Can't forget Oklahoma either.
If we were to go against Russia or China, it would be mutually assured destruction.
Wise up.
I think that if it would ever get to that point then there would'nt much of anything alive.Quote:
Originally Posted by BrolyBoo
U.S.>G.B. Fact.
U.S. has too many newks.
The first who would fire a atomic weapon would destroy boath, cause than they would fire boath their atomic weapons and it would be all finished in seconds. Nobody wins at a nuclear war and thats the only reason why usa only attacks poor people that don't have atomic bombs. For example the bomb that was dropped on hiroshima was around 15 kilotons, the biggest atomic bomb today probably goes up to 100 megatons. Interesting is that if at the Chernobyl disaster the chemicals would come in contact with the water it would probably make 1000 megatons explosion.
America has the BMD system and G.B. does not:no2:Quote:
Originally Posted by limesqueezer
Plus America will be able to inflict significantly more damage due to the large stockpile of nukes, eliminating the 2nd strike ability of G.B.
I mean if they can't stop somebody taking a plane or placing a bomb anywhere, this shield is just a fairytale of hope propaganda. You can detonate a bomb outside the america or like 1 km away from the submarine. If you detonate 100 megatons you destroy millions and polute the land for thousands of years and to which direction the wind blows, there you die slow death. In Chernobyl disaster they traced radioactive material in sweden first and it didn't even exploded and we were not allowed to eat anything from the forest or your own vegetables for months, and i don't live anywhere near.