Printable View
...as the woman in question was being charged with "malicious castration", I wondered if the male contingent here would agree (or not) that to be castrated "maliciously" would be worse than castration absent malice?
I hadn't thought of it before, but I sure am now. :ermm:
Strange....neither have i thought of stuff like that. Never occured to me lol!!!
what's that got to do with the price of eggs ?
When did eggs come into this....:PQuote:
Originally Posted by Buffalo
I haven't any idea; this isn't a shopping thread.Quote:
Originally Posted by Buffalo
Well, I guess it could be a shopping thing, J2.
If a man had eggs at home and kept shopping for more, then that might be where the malicious adjective comes into play.
But you are right. I cannot imagine the genital maiming being done without intent to harm.
Course, I watched a tv show the other night where a guy got his pierced genital caught on his partner's IUD. This probably wasn't being done maliciously, but very well could have maimed him. ;)
what's that got to do with the price of eggs ?
it's an irrelevant statement as I could not understand the original question
Want help?
Please :)
To me, he is saying using the word malicious is totally unnecessary.
This would be because the very act of castration itself would be enough.
Also...
well, does that work?