RIAA Pays $107,951 to Alleged Filesharer

http://filesharingtalk.com/vb3/pictu...&pictureid=185

"It has been something of a David and Goliath battle, but the first skirmishes in the war on file sharing are over. While the RIAA jubilantly claimed success last year, it is another case that has has now silenced the RIAA, as it avoids drawing attention to the case it never had."

"If you read a mainstream media news report about file sharing or talk to a reporter about (illicit) filesharing, you would think that the only case involving the RIAA was Capitol V Thomas, a case that made news nationwide for the size of the fines. However, there are a number of cases going on around the country, cases where the RIAA did not win.

One of the most under-reported is Atlantic V Anderson, which has taken over 3 years from start to finish. The RIAA eventually dropped it with prejudice, meaning they accept the fault was theirs in this case. A similar thing happened in the case against another alleged filesharer, Foster, but both cases were relatively under-reported in mainstream media."

:source: Source: Full Article @ TorrentFreak

This makes me so happy.

Its great to finally see both sides of the coin.

hahahahaha when i seen this shit i was like wtf ....
But am happy loool =)

me too very happy ..good work..

It's a battle in a several battle war so I don't think you can read to much into it till these types of things occur on a regular basis.

those greedy bastards deserve it