Printable View
Since OVH changed their kimsufi plans lot of my clients request the new servers to be shared too. They say they don't care about the bandiwdth which is only 1.5TB but they do care about HDD which is double the size of the old.
What would you prefer? An "unlimited" Bandwidth server of 250GB HDD(watch out for the quotes since it's a kimsufi) or double the size of hdd on your seedboxes (like 200GB each user) and 1.5TB of bandwidth ?
Please reply only if you have used a seedbox before.
I generally upload at least 100-150GB/day. I would blow through 1.5TB in way less than a month, give me more bandwidth!
Problem is the most Seedbox users are just IDIOTS. They dont care about the normal ADSL-Seeders and seeding very good seeded Files to a 1:10 Fileratio or even more,its unneeded overseeding. They got huge Buffers, but seeding all so extrem.... just IDIOTS.
4 sure Unlimited Bandwidth
whats the point buy seebox if you dont have traffic?!! you can store FILES but if you cannot shere them what the point?
1.5 TB of traffic in a month isn't sharing? :huh: I'd say hosting twice as much content and not overseeding is being much more generous than RSS;ing 0day and dumping the files after a couple days.Quote:
Originally Posted by L33cH
more hdd
More space indeed as the bandwidth is still unlimited even after those 3GB. Uploading with 10 mbps is still enough.
Seedbox are bought for sharing,not to keep the data there,so bandwidth should be more...:)
Because there are so many seedboxes ADSL users can download their stuff in no time.Quote:
Originally Posted by usuck
You seem to suggest that people should stop seeding with their fast seedboxes so people with slow ASDL lines can seed more - of course at the expense of slowing down the swarm.
If seedboxes didn't exist we'd have someone saying that ADSL users are idiots because they don't let dial up users seed, and so on.