Are we really going to send our military to Libya to start yet another war?
Is it any wonder that people in the Middle Eastern countries are so angry at us?
We need to start minding our own business and get the hell out of the Middle East.
Printable View
Are we really going to send our military to Libya to start yet another war?
Is it any wonder that people in the Middle Eastern countries are so angry at us?
We need to start minding our own business and get the hell out of the Middle East.
That would be kind but also disastrous. The current overall situation in the moslem world is a mere consequence of their ancestors leaving the job half done and the westerns with more sincerity/dedication towards their goal can't afford take the suicidal decision.They are riding on a lion, step down and end up being eaten.
I am pondering the possibility of your statement, and I don't believe it is a good choice. We are, like it or not, too dependent on their natural resources to simply cut and run, leaving destabilization. The void left would quickly be filled with either dictators, or extremists. Prices would soar, and there would not be anything- short of creating new footholds in the area- we could do about it.
Our second option is to keep things as they are. We are despised by some, tolerated by a few, and that's about it. We are there for war and trade.
The third option is to increase our efforts. This one unsettles me because Afghanistan/Iraq has been such a seemingly futile effort. However, if options 1 and 2 aren't working to our best interests, perhaps there might be some benefit to it. For a country who says it believes in freedom, and democracy, etc., we sure back a lot of regimes who are anything but democracies. Could we support democratic governments, and still meet our needs? At least the effort seems more true to what we say we believe.
Thoughts? I'm actually uncertain myself, but there seem to be only a few options (yes, I am aware of the "alternative", unrealistic options).
News:
Last Monday: ' Westerners, Keep out. We do not need you'.
This Monday: 'This is not right, they are firing back at us. We need urgent help'.
I spent my 21st birthday at a place called El Adam just south of Tobruk. At that time Gadaffi was the up and coming rebel. He won. You know the rest. One time when we were driving, in convoy, from Benghazi to Tobruk. We were in open land rovers. When driving through Derna we had everything but the kitchen sink thrown at us. We were under orders not to retaliate in any way.
It is not our country. Let them sort it out themselves. There are plenty other instance where women and children have been killed and we have stood back and did nothing. IMO we should keep it that way, unless we interfere in every instance of civilians being killed,
A lot of talk of a no fly zone over Libya because Gadaffi is retaliating and and dealing with the uprising. No talk about a no fly zone or something similar in Bahrain where Saudi Arabian troops have been called in to help quell the 'rebels'. The usual double standards by the western powers.