New restrictions regarding image hosting
To increase your security and privacy, we are now restricting the provenance of images posted on the forum to a list of reputable image hosting sites only (and FST of course).
Any image included in a post that doesn't come from a site in the white list will not be displayed and simply replaced by an hyper-link.
It is then your responsibility to be cautious when clicking on an image link, that doesn't mean it is necessarily malicious but we can't certify it is safe either.
Here's the list of authorized image hosts :
- abload.de
- bayimg.com
- filesharingtalk.com
- freebunker.com
- freeimagehosting.net
- imagehost.org
- imagehosting.com
- imagebam.com
- imagebanana.com
- imageshack.us
- imgrush.net
- imgur.com
- photobucket.com
- tinypic.com
- wimg.co.uk
Thank you.
Re: New restrictions regarding image hosting
Excellent idea. Long overdue. :)
Re: New restrictions regarding image hosting
And if you have any to add to the list let us know.
Re: New restrictions regarding image hosting
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Skiz
Excellent idea. Long overdue. :)
Plus one, thanks for this :)
Re: New restrictions regarding image hosting
So what does that mean for locally uploaded photos, they "whitelisted" as well?
Re: New restrictions regarding image hosting
Yes, since filesharingtalk.com is allowed.
Re: New restrictions regarding image hosting
Thanks for so much this is a very nice image the list of Reputable image hosting a sites only image post.
Re: New restrictions regarding image hosting
Quote:
Originally Posted by
anon
Yes, since filesharingtalk.com is allowed.
Since this thing got bumped, I couldn't help but feel to clarify my earlier question, which has long been answered. I was meaning to ask if we'd be allowed to upload from local, period. I fucked up the wording. At least that's what I think I was asking.
Re: New restrictions regarding image hosting
Quote:
Originally Posted by
seobyindia
Thanks for so much this is a very nice image the list of Reputable image hosting a sites only image post.
SEO by India, huh.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
mjmacky
Since this thing got bumped, I couldn't help but feel to clarify my earlier question, which has long been answered. I was meaning to ask if we'd be allowed to upload from local, period. I fucked up the wording. At least that's what I think I was asking.
Yes, local uploading is also fine. I couldn't post some of the funny crap I have otherwise.
Re: New restrictions regarding image hosting
Might wanna filter filehosts too while you're at it.