BD25 Remux VS BD50 1080p Encode

I tried to compare (BD25 Remux VS BD50 1080p Encode) which one would result a better quality, but i couldn't imagine it.

(Remux means: untouched video in .mkv format)

So does anyone know, or guess, which one would be better?

Thanks.

I am not the expert on video quality but if the BD50 has bigger file size then the BD25 and as it is 1080p ( BD50 ) then I think both has the almost same video quality.

Encodes can be virtually transparent, thus hard to tell. "BD25" remux means all the extras were taken out to cut down on total filesize (enough to fit on the smaller capacity disc). Since you can't tell the difference in quality, why not just go for the one that's smaller or easier to download?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mjmacky

Encodes can be virtually transparent, thus hard to tell. "BD25" remux means all the extras were taken out to cut down on total filesize (enough to fit on the smaller capacity disc). Since you can't tell the difference in quality, why not just go for the one that's smaller or easier to download?

---

Assume they are the same size, which one then? :P

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Pitch7

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mjmacky

Encodes can be virtually transparent, thus hard to tell. "BD25" remux means all the extras were taken out to cut down on total filesize (enough to fit on the smaller capacity disc). Since you can't tell the difference in quality, why not just go for the one that's smaller or easier to download?

---

Assume they are the same size, which one then? :P

---

Then just grab the remux. From what you described, they shouldn't be around the same size. Either you have no idea what you're talking about, or the encoder is practicing exercises of redundancy.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mjmacky

Either you have no idea what you're talking about

---

this

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by rootbitch

i have ideas what i am talking about but cannot put it into a certificate

---

Wow good one jdye, for a second there I confused with with pitch.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mjmacky

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Pitch7

Assume they are the same size, which one then? :P

---

Then just grab the remux. From what you described, they shouldn't be around the same size. Either you have no idea what you're talking about, or the encoder is practicing exercises of redundancy.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kukushka

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mjmacky

Either you have no idea what you're talking about

---

this

---

I'm talking about 2 different sources of the same movie assuming they have proportional picture quality.

For example;
I downloaded "Drive 2011 Blu-ray 1080p AVC DTS-HD 5.1- HDCLUB" (14.8 GB) (R5 Bluray)

When I muxed it to .mkv and removed the Russian audio; it became 11.5 GB.

So; IF in a different region (lets say US) a BD50 bluray version gets released with better quality, and if a 1080p encode is made of that with 11-12 GB size...

What would be a better choice to download, the BD25 Remux or the BD50 encode?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Pitch7

When I muxed it to .mkv and removed the Russian audio; it became 11.5 GB.

So; IF in a different region (lets say US) a BD50 bluray version gets released with better quality, and if a 1080p encode is made of that with 11-12 GB size...

What would be a better choice to download, the BD25 Remux or the BD50 encode?

---

That's unusually small for a remux. In fact most transparent 1080p encodes are bigger than that. Most bluray video streams I've seen are around 20 GB. I've only seen one region C and it wasn't small either.

Are you still trying to ask me to tell you which one to snatch? If so, how about neither, find a better movie.

What's your definition of a better movie? And what's wrong with Drive? It's got a 93 percent tomatometer rating and 8.2/10 at IMDB. Which means that critics AND audiences both like it. Or is it that no one else's opinion is supposed to matter but yours?