Movies: x264 810p
Attachment 115381
Movies: x264 480p
Attachment 115382
TV: x264 480p
Attachment 115383
TV: x264 810p
Attachment 115384
Printable View
Movies: x264 810p
Attachment 115381
Movies: x264 480p
Attachment 115382
TV: x264 480p
Attachment 115383
TV: x264 810p
Attachment 115384
Movies and TV 480p fall under the SD category.
The other two look great, though I don't see any tv posts at 810p. It looks like a lot of movies have been posted in 810p in the past 2 weeks though.
Is this becoming a new standard?
Thank for your work. Can you provide PSDs?
i designed them of you ones you have already i just managed to find the font online and change the hue and sat on http://pixlr.com/ :) not got the pxd but could easily recreate them also i have seen 480p of all of them online i also designed a whole nzbindex of your site from ground up its not quite as good as this one but its getting them..Quote:
Originally Posted by tesco
I was also about to ask about what the fuck is up with 810p, it's only mod 2 (though it's 1440 width is mod16). Either way, too small of a difference with qualifying benefit over 720p.
Yes.Quote:
Originally Posted by mjmacky
I wish they would make a standard between 480p and 720p.
720p destroys my bandwidth, but my eyes have been spoiled with all this 720p and cant stand 480p unless it's something animated.
Some are pushing for 576p as its own standard, which is even more suitable than 480p because both dimensions of 1024 x 576 are mod16 (divisible by 16, making it more compression friendly). It can work for both standard 16:9 TV and movies.Quote:
Originally Posted by tescoYes.Quote:
Originally Posted by mjmacky
I wish they would make a standard between 480p and 720p.
720p destroys my bandwidth, but my eyes have been spoiled with all this 720p and cant stand 480p unless it's something animated.
Does that mean the file size of a 575p will be lower, like say close to a 480p? Or do you just mean that it is quicker to compress.Quote:
Originally Posted by mjmacky
Yes lower. I'll break it down with an example. Imagine the video stream was encoded at a final usage of 0.4 bits/pixelQuote:
Originally Posted by tescoDoes that mean the file size of a 575p will be lower, like say close to a 480p? Or do you just mean that it is quicker to compress.Quote:
Originally Posted by mjmacky
1 hour of a 1280 x 720 yields 3.704 Gbyte
1 hour of a 1024 x 576 yields 2.371 Gbyte
1 hour of a 848 x 480 yields 1.636 Gbyte (additionally, also gives aspect ratio error).
That's for the video alone, so audio not taken into account. 0.4 bpp can usually be higher than you'd see in scene releases as well.
And compression efficiency is a result of encoding 16x16 macroblocks. When you are outside of a mod16 resolution, you lose some of that efficiency.
For example, using quality based encoding, if you encode at 850 x 480, the file size will be closer to if you encoded 864 x 480 than if you encoded to 848 x 480. That's why shaving off those extra couple of pixels per frame makes an unexpected drastic difference (depending on the resolution).
I still have the PSD's from the originals. Need them?Quote:
Originally Posted by tesco
I've still got them as well, just wanted to add the new ones to the collection since they contain some new backgrounds.Quote:
Originally Posted by SkizI still have the PSD's from the originals. Need them?Quote:
Originally Posted by tesco