wich is better or faster????
Printable View
wich is better or faster????
klite has no adds or pop-ups, that's about the only difference between the two...also neither is faster than the other. Same amount of files and people online for both as far as I can tell.
I would have to argue K-Lite is faster.... it has a constant 1000 PL (gives you priority) and also it has find more sources programs
My Bad! ur right of course...silly me :rolleyes:Quote:
Originally posted by Lite@10 January 2004 - 16:48
I would have to argue K-Lite is faster.... it has a constant 1000 PL (gives you priority) and also it has find more sources programs
k-lite also have tools that are helpful like AVIpreview, k-dat, k-sig
If you use normal KMD Kazaa 2.6 you might not be able to connect properly with K++ Users, cause Sharman tried to made K++ not able to connect to Kazaa 2.6 as I heared. But that is quite useless as KMD 2.6 contains so much Spyware.
If you properly want to connect with other Users use K++ 2.4.3 ;) That is the best you can get. You also can use KMD up to 2.5, K++ 2.4.2, K++ 2.0.1 ;)
You'd have to be nuts to pick regular KMD over K-Lite! :wacko:
Typo :P
ok, im nuts - i dont use L lite :lol:Quote:
Originally posted by KrackHead2k@11 January 2004 - 22:30
You'd have to be nuts to pick regular KMD over L-Lite! :wacko:
Crap, now that was a typo! :P
ok, im nuts - i dont use L lite :lol: [/b][/quote]Quote:
Originally posted by Lite+11 January 2004 - 23:37--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Lite @ 11 January 2004 - 23:37)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-KrackHead2k@11 January 2004 - 22:30
You'd have to be nuts to pick regular KMD over L-Lite! :wacko:
Nut? I don't think so, only mentioned that KMD has so much Spyware now - when
I get the information on Kazaa from an Audiogalaxy User I first also used the yellow Kazaa, then came to Kazaa Lite (also yellow, but Lite) and then I come to K++ ;)