Quote:
Originally posted by manker@29 June 2004 - 02:27
ugh, read the original post! zedaxax doesn't want to start a pr0n site, he was merely curious about the images that seem to crop up at several of them.
here is what I know:
for every photograph that is taken in a private place, i.e. indoors or on private land. someone, somewhere owns the copyright. whether it be the subject in the picture, the photographer or some third party. if the piccy is taken in a public place then usually the photographer gets to own the copyright.
however because of the ease of proliferation of pics over the internet due to newsgroups in the main and, of course, filesharing plus the relative anonymity associated with the net, it's not common practice for a company to sue another company, or individual if they use their pr0n picture, they merely send a request to remove it from their site.
lastly since pr0n is abundant, anything over, say, 6 months old is considered to be practically worthless so most companies wont even bother with an email asking for another to remove it's older pr0n images.
and that is why the web is awash with pr0n :bag:
wow dude, do u have, like, a PhD in p0rn or something? :blink: