who has all them?
Printable View
who has all them?
What do you mean"who has them"? Are you asking for a invite? If you are you are in the wrong section. If not then be more specific.
@OP : What are ya on about..eh?
Me.
Wait a sec while I clear my inbox, lol.
my bad i mean who do they hand out invites to.....
Uploaders and VIPs afaik.Quote:
Originally Posted by superkiller1
VIPs and above.
They removed all invites below "Uploader class", because of traders/cheaters etc...
They thought that it's more easy to watch a little part of members, and i think that it's not a bad thing.
VIPs and above.
:pinch:Quote:
Originally Posted by dukezoro
ignorance is bliss..:shifty:
PS: getting back to topic..
invites are handed out to uploaders and above.
Don't give out information if you have no idea what you're talking about.Quote:
Originally Posted by dukezoro
Uploaders get 1 invite/month, VIPs have unlimited.
^^ you basically said the same thing as the guy you are tryin to shit on.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ca_aokDon't give out information if you have no idea what you're talking about.Quote:
Originally Posted by dukezoro
Uploaders get 1 invite/month, VIPs have unlimited.
No he didn't, because "Uploader class" is below "Vip class". :whistlingQuote:
Originally Posted by sez
^^ that's what you are made to believe :whistling:
Well I think it was a really shitty thing to do to longtime members. I have been onthe tracker for well over 100 weeks and still got my inviting privileges taken away for being below uploader class. I can understand changing the 100 days rule to a higher number, maybe to a year or something like that, but I really don't think taken them away from every normal user is a good thing. It makes the tracker stagnate.
Well, The invites are only distributed to IPs and above.
Is that OK? :dabs:
Since I have 0 invites in my account and haven't since that stupid rule was put in place, no not really. I may not have been an uploader on there ever, but I sure have invited people who have uploaded new stuff and have kept lots of things alive for a long long time... well that is until I started getting overseeding warnings for being the only seeder on 8 month old stuff and someone grabbing it putting me over 3.0 ratio limit. I got so pissed off, I deleted most torrents and went on a hit n' run downloading spree to get to around 2.0 ratio.
Why feel bad about shutting your client down, when that's how much you are appreciated at some of the sites.
I love quality of uploads on Pedro's, but with some of the politics in running the site, I have to wonder what the purpose of being a member is. It's not like a site with uploaders, VIP and staff only would run very well.
And IPs? I haven't got the faintest idea what that is.
he wanted to say "VIPs"Quote:
Originally Posted by Night0wl
ahh.. thanks for decrypting that message :D
I was really pleased to help you to understand these strange words :PQuote:
Originally Posted by n00bz0r
You'd be surprised. That's more or less how E runs.Quote:
Originally Posted by Night0wl
You seem to be under the impression that you "deserve" invites just because you have an old account. Not sure how you got that impression, quite frankly I was surprised they had that system in the first place. Invites are a privilege, not a right. They were taken a way in part because too many crappy people were being invited.
You want invites? Try uploading. You only have to upload one CD every 3 months to maintain the status... if that's a huge burden for you perhaps you should rethink how committed you are to the site.
As for overseeding, don't even get me started on that.
^^ well said.
Actually it isn't how E runs. I have never felt that way about E. I have never got my ratio red from seeding too much from albums, that I seeded for ages and often as only seed. I have had one invite request rejected, but after talking it over with staff explaining my motives, I was asked to apply for same invite again, this time being granted.
If you think my ratio went red on Pedro's from seedboxing new torrents then think again.
Those sites are not comparable at all.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ca_aokYou'd be surprised. That's more or less how E runs.Quote:
Originally Posted by Night0wl
You seem to be under the impression that you "deserve" invites just because you have an old account. Not sure how you got that impression, quite frankly I was surprised they had that system in the first place. Invites are a privilege, not a right. They were taken a way in part because too many crappy people were being invited.
You want invites? Try uploading. You only have to upload one CD every 3 months to maintain the status... if that's a huge burden for you perhaps you should rethink how committed you are to the site.
As for overseeding, don't even get me started on that.
Regardless as to whether you're an uploader there, E is completely driven by its uploaders/VIP as half the staff are either inactive or apathetic towards the site. The vast majority of posts, comments, and downloads are from Uploaders+, and I'd estimate at least 50% of the active userbase of the site is Uploader+, if not more. You might feel less oppressed there (due to their lack of overseeding rules), but that doesn't make your statements more true.
As for your issues with overseeding at Pedro's, I sympathize with your plight. If you check the threads on overseeding at E (and at Pedro's if they weren't deleted after the staff incident a few months back) you'll see I was vocally outspoken against the overseeding arguments.
you cannot request invites because you aer a noob. so wait your turn to transgress to the next userclass. Reported.
i'm not sure that Pedro's need people who aren't uploaders or/and power users = users who make a donation. Uploading 1 cd per 13 weeks isn't so difficult. And yeah i realy respect their overseeding policy. It's just a great example of a tracker there you don't need a seedbox to keep a good ratio.
only uploaders and above can invite ppls to get there
btw:as far as i know...Pedro's is better for those whose connection speed isn't that good...
Speed doesn't matter at all. Any idiot capable of slowing down it in client if it's really that high.
Those, who has speedy connection, may wait another hour while downloading from slow peer, if they really care about music and not about traffic.
aha. and if they really really really care, they will cross the world and follow the favourite band on their tour. as i said at their forums, i don't mind about protecting low speed peers but there are better ways to protect them without fearing of the high speeds by tuning the ratio system, while instead of that, btm just require extra attention from its users. the tracker should be around music, not around ratio problems, don't you think?Quote:
Originally Posted by pretend
Making the invite, a reward for those who really do something around there.Quote:
Originally Posted by lisabritpop
:stars: ( if youre there, you shouldn't be )Quote:
Originally Posted by lisabritpop
___________________________________________________________________
Again, i want to be invited because i heard, you guys can make my pennis bigger.
I think that only retarded can't spend a minute to ensure torrent won't go over 3.Quote:
Originally Posted by kukushka
only a retard would say that... or at least someone whit nothing to do all day...Quote:
Originally Posted by pretend
No offence to anyone. It's just too easy to be a reason for complaining.
lol nice quoting :lol:Quote:
Originally Posted by Bad-Dayonly a retard would say that... or at least someone whit nothing to do all day...Quote:
Originally Posted by kukushka
:lol: :lol:Quote:
Originally Posted by Bad-Dayonly a retard would say that... or at least someone whit nothing to do all day...Quote:
Originally Posted by kukushka
moving on, I think Ps ratio system is great,though am of the opinion that its upto the tracker to develop the necessary tech(if its even possible)to ensure nobody's ratio goes past 3.0
LOl, did not notice it :D
cmon look at me, its normal :D
Does it worth making a request then??
On P's invitation? Depends on your likings.Quote:
Originally Posted by ovisan
It's quite impossible. Tracker helps peers to connect and gathers stats, but it hardly can (if can at all) take any control of traffic amount transferred to prevent from overseeding.Quote:
Originally Posted by sez
Well that's not impossible at all. There is absolutely nothing preventing a tracker from collecting stats on any single torrent on every user, transferring anything over 3.0 ratio to other users who downloaded the same torrent.
Site coders mess around with upload/download stats on torrents all the time. Sites keep single torrent data. Site staff can change your upload/download amount. It's simply automating the process.
Then people can seed to their hearts content and will be helping others out in the process.
Stats can be altered, but not actual data transfer limited.