Can't trust this.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LI87PRgIKks
Printable View
Can't trust this.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LI87PRgIKks
Someone tell me precisely what the EU has done - in it's entire history - for the UK?
I could give you a list of negative things the EU has brought to the UK, but for reasons of being attacked by left wing nutjobs or better yet Jeremy Corbyn voters/cult. Or start a true debate that the one that will hurt much more on the split is the EU;)
I will pass on the subject, other than saying i think it will be great for the UK to get rid of the EU for many, many, many reasons;)
Try finding a paper that isn't left wing to support your narrative?? Like i said what is the worry?? Let them go and fail then especially if you think it will hurt the UK more than the EU;)
It was almost like i called you out, or you never would have posted what you did Cabby, but again i still luv ya buddy;)
True story for you about Canada Cabby.... There has been a few votes on Quebec trying to separate from Canada.. Now the majority of Canadians don't give 2 shits if they leave, but if they do, they are to pay back all of there Debt owing to Canada and all the military bases, would also be removed from there province, that is lost revenue plus subsidies they get from the Government. Guess what Cabby, Quebec is still a province of Canada;)
What is the UK going to lose if they leave?? Going back and forth, they still will deal with the EU, but just have borders and control who comes into there Country??
What is going to change?? What am i missing?? There should be borders on every large Country in Europe to control and protect there citizens, you don't agree with that??
That would be an interesting answer to that question if you are willing too:). I am not sure how you feel about open borders??
Do you agree with this Cabby,,, If Corbyn wins in the upcoming election it will answer some questions about Brexit??
Edit: Crickets on response from who i would say the most knowledgeable person here about Europe
Go figure....
We already have borders and control on who comes into our country, because we used our veto and opted out of the Schengen area. You CANNOT get into the UK without a passport, even from continental Europe.
It's a complete myth we don't have border controls, hence the reason people have to resort to trying to sneak in via lorries and dinghies.
The trouble is, people cannot seem to distinguish in their minds between illegal immigrants and the legal immigration that is required to plug skills shortages, e.g. doctors, nurses, fruit pickers, etc. (Yes, it seems UK-born people are incapable of picking fruit, hence why millions of apples have rotted away on trees this year, because of a shortage of EU migrant workers!)
I think it's a language thing. Incomers to this country are always referred to as "migrants", however isn't it strange how people from this country who go and retire in Spain for example are referred to as "ex-pats"...
This whole "uncontrolled immigration" trope is a complete lie. The strain on public services is not caused by immigration, it's caused by the aging native population not dying off.
The "Boomers" clinging on to life after they've ruined the world for the rest of us... nice one. *slow hand-clap*
But people are so thick they believe anything the right-wing press spoon-feeds them.
Interesting what about showing both sides??
https://www.theweek.co.uk/brexit-0
https://briefingsforbrexit.com/ten-r...uropean-union/
https://www.spectator.co.uk/2018/02/...d-love-brexit/
And there is lots more if you want ;)
So when you travel by car/ferry there is borders?? Do you have by chance a link you could show me??
And when people work in a different country, do they usually have to have papers/green card of employment?? I know if you want to work in the US or Canada from another country you do, Revenue Canada or the IRS usually requires that??
Again that is not EU regulations that show in your link??
Right wing Left wing and many in the middle right?? Like every democratic country Barbarossa, and the middle may have views they like on either side, now you pick the ones close to your views right.. There is no such thing as saying ya my parents or family voted for that party there whole life now, party views have changed drastically!!!. You really do have to look at there policies...
And the truth knowing just by any media you choose, there is a big problem with illegal immigration in the UK, because of zero borders, so you saying there is a kind of strict border, how are they getting in so easy?? Or you are ok with it??
If you remember reading about the left in the US saying there was no problem at there borders, and when they went to visit they saw something different?? Or in Canada the stress it is putting on our so called social benefits??
The same with the difference in parties in the UK?? Not sure who you want, but myself i prefer a Moderate Conservative, party not a Socialists open border let all the crap in the Country one??
Again not disrespecting who you prefer i am just giving you my view points that i read in between the lines of the media reporting....
All true citizens should be protected and taken care of first, in any country....
PS.. Here is an interesting question Barbarossa for you...When you ever here the word "Union" in anything controlled?? Do you think it benefits the people?? Or the people controlling the Union??
And if you have no problems with the EU or Immigration in the UK?? Why was Brexit even invented??
And as i said in my other post, soon you will see if the people of the UK want Brexit or floods of immigration ??
Attachment 183678
No. But I know for a fact if I drive to Dover right now and ask for tickets on a ferry to France, I'm going nowhere without showing them a passport. And in case you were wondering, you literally need some form of identification to travel from the mainland GB to Northern Ireland by ferry or plane, and they're supposed to be two parts of the same country!
I'm saying there is a strict border. That's why people hide in lorries. That's why people risk their lives on inflatable boats. There is a problem with illegal immigration, but it's not as massive a problem as the media likes to make out.
Two words. Tax avoidance. The whole thing (Brexit) is a massive con-trick. It's not going to make life any better for the average man in the street. In fact it'll make things a heck of a lot harder.
why is that never reported anywhere is interesting, plane i could understand for sure, but a ferry?? what about the tunnel Barbarossa??
No a strict border would have caught that truck/lorries full of immigrants that died, that went through how many European countries and was never caught or inspected?? I think we have a different interpretation of security borders..Quote:
I'm saying there is a strict border. That's why people hide in lorries. That's why people risk their lives on inflatable boats. There is a problem with illegal immigration, but it's not as massive a problem as the media likes to make out.
Every truck or boat that tries to cross country lines is inspected or has to have the proper shipping papers or it ain't getting into the country, plus there is inspection station on main highways that the trucks must stop at if they are open, that is security, and borders......
Tax avoidance, who?? Again how do you know if it is going to be better or worse?? I see positives and negatives reported and opinions on both, i don't see anything on Tax avoidance even on left wing news reporting, mainly reporting on again ease of travelling in and out of the UK, and getting stricter on the immigration troubles, and taking over towns not allowing and diversity, and controlling there own finances and who they want to trade with?? So that is false reporting on many different news outlets??Quote:
Two words. Tax avoidance. The whole thing (Brexit) is a massive con-trick. It's not going to make life any better for the average man in the street. In fact it'll make things a heck of a lot harder.
Again i assume you are on the ground there, so hearing from you will usually be more accurate than reading news Barbarossa. That is depending on who you are voting for in the election?? That also makes your viewpoints different right.
The Financial Times is about as left-wing as The Wall Street Journal. Just sayin'...
Fact is, free trade within the EU is growing the economy. Conversely, if the UK is leaving the EU, it's pretty much guaranteed that their economy is going to contract, with all the associated impacts on employment and living standards.
But, hey, I am sure that's worth it. Rule Britannia!
As for Corbyn, I don't follow UK politics closely enough to have an opinion on him and what he stands for (or, apparently, doesn't). I don't vote over there, so I can't say that I really give a rat's ass about specific people.
No disagreement there Cabby, but i check out all the news sites and then read in the middle and hopefully that is the truth, that is unless i know people on the ground where i am inquiring about;). That's why i laugh when people here think i only get my news from Fox:D
Hey i don't disagree with you there, it was the same with that pound/dollar when Brexit was voted on, again that bounced back right...Quote:
Fact is, free trade within the EU is growing the economy. Conversely, if the UK is leaving the EU, it's pretty much guaranteed that their economy is going to contract, with all the associated impacts on employment and living standards.
But, hey, I am sure that's worth it. Rule Britannia!
That is my point all along, there will be some setbacks, but not it is how long it takes to bounce back right, and then the positives for Brexit will start right away. It is strange that Barbarossa says there is some sort of Border structure in the UK , i know the majority of the EU countries don't have that??
Well not giving a Rats ass about specific people, still he is the head of the party right, so he is the front man for the policies of the party, but i do understand what you are saying for sure, and really it does come down to the party and how they want to run the country, truly i think you might like there policies, but not the baggage of controversy that comes with it:D..Quote:
As for Corbyn, I don't follow UK politics closely enough to have an opinion on him and what he stands for (or, apparently, doesn't). I don't vote over there, so I can't say that I really give a rat's ass about specific people.
I just figured you would see some news/info, on the sites you go to from Europe on the whole.(you know i see info where i go;). And i would think there is some effect how a country feels about the EU when they are a part of it??
Thanks for the response buddy, it is always appreciated.
GBP / USD exchange rate on June 22, 2016: 1.467791
GBP / USD exchange rate on Dec 5, 2019: 1.316335
That's an 11% decrease.
GBP / EUR exchange rate on June 22, 2016: 1.300594
GBP / EUR exchange rate on Dec 5, 2019: 1.185596
That's a 9% decrease.
GBP / JPY exchange rate on June 22, 2016: 153.459493
GBP / JPY exchange rate on Dec 5, 2019: 143.079307
That's a 7% decrease.
Sure, that pound bounced right back...
Compared to what it was?? It was really in the toilet!!!... Again what ever happens happens, like you said what the fuck is the difference, it is not going to hurt the EU right ;)...
And depending on the coming election, there either will be a Brexit or not:happy:
I can tell you they reported our jobs report in Canada, it was in the toilet big time, How was the report in the US buddy??;)
I lit a fuse.
Heh.
At first glance, I'm leaning toward concluding the "info" is akin to what our domestic Dems are referring to as "irrefutable evidence supporting impeachment".
Essentially, certain people want a European Union to kneel in supplication before their Globalist intent.
Thank you for your thoughts and prayers - my nephew recently retired from Naval service at Pensacola.
Events there are going to result in more horse-fucking around about foreign nationals on our shores...sure doesn't aid the case for immigration, either.
Yep we've dumped on our currency big time but the whole point (as far as I know - being a half-wit English bloke) was to get rid of the EU courts and them having rules over our elected joke of a party (Boris you are so cool, just like Donald)
It amazes me Gribley that everyone has a different meaning on what Brexit is?? The question still stands, and you are on the ground there, is leaving the EU going to affect you in a positive or negative way:idunno:..
And Cabby showing your currency price dropped and it was way worse, did it affect you personally, if you don't mind me asking??
And it is great to see ya buddy, alive and kicking as usual ;)
If he wanted to go to Spain for his winter vacation, chances are it affects him very much since the devaluation of the pound makes his trip more expensive. if he likes to stay in Yorkshire, maybe not so much. Unless there are a whole bunch of Americans who like to take advantage of their cheaper vacation options and cause the hotel rooms in Yorkshire to become more expensive (supply/demand you know), so then, yes, even then he'd be affected.
Those bananas he likes to eat for breakfast? Imported, which means more expensive. That replacement part for his BMW that he needs? Imported, so more expensive.
Those bankers who got laid off in the city? Drawing unemployment and not contributing to her majesty's revenue, so less money available for the NHS.
So yes, even if it is not obvious, it affects him personally.
That makes sense buddy, i was just curious really that when your Currency/Pound did loose some value, did it change any costing living in the UK??
I do understand that policies/agendas in government parties, are going to make changes, but the question is how much is it really going to change??
That i guess is always the scary thing Gribley.....
Another question i like to ask you, do you use the local currency or the Euro ?? I would assume both are pretty much accepted no??
UK is pound sterling only, no euros.
Well inflation, cost of goods etc, thinking that every currency fluctuates, costs are going to change no matter what no Cabby??
What i would say is how drastic?? Again the UK separating is not going to make it Venezuela;), and again really not knowing and only using assumptions costs could go up or down on certain products or services....
And you assumptions can be applied to any import to any country, especially if it is not produced or made locally?? As i said many times you can go to Walmart and buy fruit and vegetables or you can go to a higher priced grocery store, again the fruit may come from the same place but there is different grade qualities right...
So saying that you base everything on assumptions of the EU being better, but until there is a split, there is no proof. Especially when you see different views and projections on both sides..
Right now are you getting any or using any international petroleum/gas/oil/natural gas products in the US?? Has the price gone down?? or are you seeing any benefits from that?? Really what fruit or vegetable can't be grown in the US somewhere?? Yet you still get imports right??
If a GM, Ford, Chrysler car/truck etc is built in the US do you save any money?? If i go to a dealership for Toyota or Lexus here is it different from going to one in the US (except dollar evaluation)...
Again costs can and will change, positive and negative, but i don't think to a degree that makes the separation/Brexit the biggest issue. Getting rid of EU control and controlling borders is more the issue..
But hey what do i know right:)
Really i didn't know that, that is interesting, what other countries don't accept the Euro and is part of the Eu??
I always thought that any country that is part of the EU the euro is accepted?? Does the Euro influenced by the countries that are part of the EU??
Edit: Cabby can you answer this buddy, the way you comment you make it seem that the EU gets no benefits from UK being a member??
Is that true?? So will that not affect everyone that is part of the EU in a positive or negative way??
I have never said that the EU is not getting any benefits from UK membership, quite the contrary. Germany, for example, being a net exporter of goods benefits from a larger internal market for its products. Free flow of goods, people and capital benefits everyone. Standardization of technical specifications, wider application of laws and all that jazz do not impede trade; more trade generally means growing economies, a greater tax base and hence more services for the population. So yes, the UK leaving would affect the EU in a negative way.
As for the Euro countries, look here: https://europa.eu/european-union/abo...es-use-euro_en
That's a stupid argument; just because things get more expensive due to inflation does not mean that you should disregard cost increases due to other reasons, like currency devaluation.
If your currency is worth 10% less then that means that your imports are 10% more expensive. As a consumer you might only see a 5% increase in what you pay, but that just means that the importer is eating the other 5%. That extra cost means higher operating expenses/lower margins, hence lower profits, lower tax payments (or at some point the company goes bust and lays off all its employees, with all the associated costs for society). Etc.
Now all of that makes some sense, but a self sustained country is always better, but we both know that is impossible ;)
So saying that, the UK or Germany or any country leaving the EU still boggles my mind why you cant make free trade or negotiate trade deals with or without the EU, again border and immigration i see as the biggest issues/changes. But if the UK can make other deals in trade to benefit themselves or who they choose to deal with will not make the UK worse off...
Again my opinion be it right or wrong, and what ever happens happens....
Thanks for the link as well Cabby, Interesting, Italy, Germany, France are on the Euro list, so they don't use local currency?? Just curious even know it is not a standard in other EU countries, say i cross the border to Buffalo, they will accept Canadian currency (with an exchange rate of course), again we know it is for the usual reasons to get cross border shopping right and vise versa for Americans coming to Canada. I would think it is pretty much known who is part of the EU, and the concept of open border travelling across all, they would accept the euro even if they had there own currency, especially in a tourist perspective..
Again your point of increase and eating cost, from my experience or knowledge, unless it is drastic, most of the time in costing anything that is imported there is a built in leeway, because of currency exchanges.. Most of the time you see large increases on things because of availability, and or seasonal items...
And think if it is a perishable items, for sure that is built into the costing....
But it goes to saying is Brexit going to turn the UK into a third world country?? I don't think so, and is it going to bankrupt the EU?? I don't think so. And really the question Cabby, is at least half or more of the Country citizens want to separate from the EU. So saying that you are going to please everyone no matter if they stay or go seems to be irreverent really..
Again i doubt it is going to change your life or mine, really this is just conversation and opinions, and trying to get some facts of the good and bad for a country right:)...
Again i will ask you, your gas you put in your car now is not from outside the US i assume now right, are you seeing any savings from that?? Why isn't there??
Our raw gas actually comes from Canada as well, but it is refined in the US so when it comes back we get fucked!!!!. But what i don't understand and maybe you do, is why prices are still influenced from the Middle East ?? Do you have an answer for that?? I sure don't...
OK, you go to your local electronics store, and let's say they are actually willing to negotiate on what they charge you for their products.
Scenario #1: "Hi, I am Shaina, I am a buyer for XYZ company, and we need 3,000 widgets."
Scenario #2: "Hi, I am Shaina, I need 2 widgets, please."
Which scenario do you think will yield the better price for you?
And after you answer that, tell me why any country would give the UK as a single entity more favorable trade terms than the EU that as a block can offer a vastly greater market? We've had this discussion for I don't know how long; It's really not that difficult to understand... Sheesh.
And no, a self-sustained country is not always better if that means that your necessities that you produce at home are so resource-intensive that you cannot provide any nice-to-haves for the population. Trade allows for efficiencies and lifts the overall living standard. That's basic macro-economics.
To be honest that is a loaded and stupid question, because if you were me or like most consumers today, they look online and elsewhere for the lowest price and most stores will price match... But to go further, even by your logic there is only a price that can be considered the least and it is up to the manufacturer or retailer if they do accept your offer no matter if yo buy 1 or a 1000...
So now lets go back to your answer to one of my questions, the EU needs the UK just as much or more right, why?? Maybe because they do have to buy products or give jobs opportunity to outside UK citizens no??Quote:
And after you answer that, tell me why any country would give the UK as a single entity more favorable trade terms than the EU that as a block can offer a vastly greater market? We've had this discussion for I don't know how long; It's really not that difficult to understand... Sheesh.
You are looking one sided and not the other in my opinion, yes the UK will need imports and other countries will want the UK products that exports do you not see my point here yet??
Well i see this different for reasons of reliability, and have the option of negotiating for imports with strength on negotiations not weakness. The UK leaving will not be because of weakness or this whole Brexit thing would be mute...Quote:
And no, a self-sustained country is not always better if that means that your necessities that you produce at home are so resource-intensive that you cannot provide any nice-to-haves for the population. Trade allows for efficiencies and lifts the overall living standard. That's basic macro-economics.
You getting mad on not looking at both sides of any debate is amusing. I don't disagree that there will be some obstacles, but it is workable with opening new trade deals as well..
Now take this scenario.. If a company buys 10 Jaguar Cars or buys a 1000 how much are they saving?? Plus now they have to pay for the Jaguar Cars and sell them....
Now how does business work really today in retail or internet sales.... The manufacturer projects sales and makes products, and it can be anything, that doesn't mean that a retailer purchases everything at once, you do understand that right?? So now the retailer has a winner and they draw from the manufacturer, and they may pay more in the beginning, and at the end of the year if they hit certain projections they get discounts, you do understand that right??
I mention grades of produce , now add meat products or wheat's and grains or anything, again if i country gives an order or projections of sales, then the farmers etc go by projections, what is the difference on negotiating with a Country or the EU?? If the UK has something that is in demand in all the EU countries what they won't buy it anymore??
I don't get your logic Cabby or your concept of negotiations?? The EU has more countries they deal with, are you telling me they have better negotiating power than the US?? China?? There is only so low you can go on anything if you buy 10 or you buy 1000000000.... And if you don't need those large amounts what is the difference?? It looks like a lot of savings because you are buying bigger volume, but if you can't sell, what is it good for?? If you buy 10 planes and not 100 how much are you saving??
If you use a place like Costco or the Internet really today, what margins do you think they make on a product retail?? and do you not think they have the best negotiators for purchasing on the planet??
Your view is one sided that the UK is not need for export purposes, and if they leave no one dictates who they sell or what they sell??
Canada purchases products from all over the world, what they don't negotiate??, Do you think the EU makes better deals than Canada on imports?? The EU has a much bigger population no?? Bigger than the US?? I wish we had someone like Trump that is stirring the pot and negotiating better deals for the People in Canada....
Don't make the EU to be the be all end all Cabby, the UK is very capable of surviving and thrive without the EU. And if they are smart like Trump, they won't let anyone fuck with them;)
Again really going back I don't think there is a fear of that as much as the fear of having closed borders on the Labour Party and there voters.....
The rest is really all crap!!!
But we will see soon how the citizens of the UK feel when they vote......The truth you may be right, really who knows:idunno:
Our last election in Canada Cabby, the early poles/projections were way the fuck off!!! The same in 2016 in the US right.....
Attachment 183701
Are you out there!!! Calling J2K4:gunsmilie
That is absolutely not a loaded/stupid question, because you are missing the point. Regardless of whether you find the cheapest seller online or in your neighborhood, that person's price to you will be influenced by your purchasing power. The more money you have to spend and the more items you are going to purchase, the more likely that person is to give you the rock-bottom price. So your on-line seller may be the cheapest, but if you buy a thousand widgets your price is probably still going to be 10 cents cheaper per widget than if you bought only one. And since companies' cost structures are different from each other, the ability to price match at some point is limited, unless you like selling at a loss. But then, why would you do it? Maybe because you plan on using that widget as a loss leader and hope to make it up on a different item/sale? In that case we are back at the principle of purchasing power.
Does Europe need the UK as much as the other way round? Unpopular answer, but no. Does having the UK as part of the EU provide a benefit to the EU? Yes. But quite frankly, from a trade perspective and all the other good stuff I mentioned, EU membership has more value to the UK than the other way round. It's not a binary choice, really -- "not as much" does not equal "none".
Let's look at it in a different way. Let's say there is a market in Japan for 100 widgets, and both the EU and the UK post-Brexit are competing for access to that market. Japan wants to sell gadgets. The EU comes and says, "Hey, our market for gadgets is worth 1,000 pieces. We will reduce tariffs and duties and let you export 750 gadgets into the EU, but only if you buy 100 widgets from us and/or reduce your tariffs on EU widgets to that they are the cheapest in your country versus other imports." Now the UK comes and says, "Hey, we'd like to ship 100 widgets to you, and in return you can supply our entire gadget market, which is 150 units."
I can confidently predict which trade deal will be signed in that scenario.
I'm not mad. I'm just frustrated that I am apparently such a crappy teacher that I cannot convey simple economics to you. Clearly my career as a university prof would be untenured nd short-lived...
The UK leaving would not be because of weakness, agreed. It's because of politicians' and lobbyists hidden agendas and their lying to the uninformed population. Coming back to that GBP 350 million every month that the Tories were going to spend on the NSH instead of allegedly sending the money to Brussels...
If a Jaguar costs $100,000 and you are able to negotiate a 5% discount because you are buying a thousand, then you just saved $5 million on your total purchase.
You do understand that even in retail large sellers enter into annual or multi-year contracts with large manufacturers that are a commitment even if they don't take everything at once, right? And that the discounts they give/receive at the end of the year are based on volumes ordered/sold? But wait, that would mean that we are talking about market size and purchasing power! Fancy that...
Not in the same quantities. At some (price) point a substitution effect kicks in. Again, basic economics.
Your problem is that you have a misconception about what countries negotiate with each other. The EU and the US and Japan and China are not negotiating prices for specific products, that is ultimately up to the market (maybe not so much in China's case). They are negotiating frameworks for the trade between their countries that will ultimately affect the price that the individual companies in the market will agree on. If Canada can make an item 5% cheaper than the US, but will have to pay an import tariff of 10% that the US does not have to pay, who do you think is able to offer a cheaper price? Go back and read my Japanese gadget/widget example again.
I knew this conversations would go back and forth, with no result :)
All my point is, you think that the EU has some sort of advantage, but you just don't realize that people do talk and know what others are paying, so if the EU is getting some sort of discount, everyone will negotiate for that price, and i do hope you realize that there is only so low anyone can go, meaning that no one sells at a loss unless they want to get rid of something. That makes sense right;).. So when it comes to purchases of 10,000 or 30,000 there is no real discount difference.. Because if you think this way, if the UK is the bigger consumer of certain products/produce, the deal will stay, if not, it will be negotiated, or they can go direct and hope for the best. Your logic makes sense for a small population, but the UK is not a small population, i hope you agree with that....
Your car concept.... Think of this, if you know a dealership is selling cars 5% cheaper than any other one, what happens to the 100's of the rest?? Think of the Price matching method, and also realize who actually eats that differential today...
If you know that the US is buying cars 5% cheaper, than the EU , what would the EU do?? You make it sound like people don't talk, but i will say it again there is a bottom line to everyone, and the manufacturers are not in business to lose money buddy so your teaching of economics are not valid....
I know not only owning my own retail stores and buying direct from manufactures and working for people as well, you can sell anything you want for any price you want Cabby, but if you want to be in business the next year, you have to make profit or make a living , or what is the sense right;)
Getting into Tariffs, is a whole bag of worms, and they are effective to help any local Manufacturing, but it could affect the pocket books of the countries consumers. Really what Trump is doing is brilliant, as long as he keeps things close and costs of locally manufactured products don't go crazy in price.. Am i missing something there in lament terms Cabby??
Your concept makes sense if there is a large volume difference in purchasing, but it would have to be such a significant difference. The EU is going to lose the use of products that the UK did consume if they split, if the UK decides to negotiate direct, and as a Manufacturer, what do you think they are going to do?? Charge more?? Come on Cabby does that really make sense buddy:). And Tariffs and Duties work both ways and can be negotiated, you understand the concept of the USMCA right;)
Again all the answers are going to come soon enough how the UK feels, and then we can actually discuss why either way what happened:D
I'm gonna take the easy way out, here.
We need to have two Brits argue opposite ends of the Brexit yes/no issue.
As an anti-globalist, I fall in the pro camp by default: I think it smacks of the collectivism that - as history has taught us - sucks cawk.
It's just that simple.
To me that sounds like a chicken shit cop out :)
Here we may need a Scottish and Brit if you are watching any of the election, and it will be interesting how this reflects how people think in the US about radical Democrat policies/agendas??
And i am waiting for the Labour party to say the Russians interfered with there elections and Boris should be hung for treason LOL!!!! Oh and don't forget Gerrymandering LOL!!!. Not realizing that even if you take Brexit out of the picture the Labour party ideas and agenda was retarded let alone turned the party into the biggest Antisemitic one as well. Kind of like what is happening in the Democratic party in the US;)..
Again it is confusing to listen too and watch the UK election, the people are speaking, and will be interesting to see what happens in the end:idunno:...
And i guess you can say goodbye to the piece of shit anti semitic garbage Corbyn, and his people, and hopefully get the party back to what it used to be. Sounds familiar in the US and Canada as well;)