post ur aquamark results :P
ill post mine when i get home
Printable View
post ur aquamark results :P
ill post mine when i get home
lol aquamark misreadmy core mhz speed
here
What is your core speed then?
I cant get Aqua Mark to show my damn scores right on the net...but they are 37,890
Here's mine.
results
536/921Quote:
Originally posted by bigdawgfoxx@24 January 2004 - 15:55
What is your core speed then?
I cant get Aqua Mark to show my damn scores right on the net...but they are 37,890
http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_vie...run=1415360567
Here are my scores from last week, when I got them the highest.
LOL!!
My demon system appears HERE... <ahem> not that impressive! :D
Heres mine!
http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_vie...run=1281544924
my computer died trying this test?!?!?!??!!??!?! isa it not compatible with the 9800xt??????!?!?!?!?!?!??!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!~?!?!?!?!?!?!?! SHIT!?!?!?!?!
LOL hehehe but i imagine it is very high... i can always dream... :rolleyes:
thats not a good sign...could have overheated or it was very unstable....run some burn in test and check it out...
Samurai, 324 / 290 MHz is not the correct default clock for the 9800 Pro.Quote:
378/337 is R9800 pro. What do you have? A modded driver? Or the 9800 non pro?
don't know... that was with the 9800xt from ATI... It benchs fine on 3dmark... 03 gets over 10k... but this prog doesn't seem to run.. and overheating is not a problem... trust me... :D (Card temps are at 6 degrees celsius...)Quote:
thats not a good sign...could have overheated or it was very unstable....run some burn in test and check it out...
Samurai, 324 / 290 MHz is not the correct default clock for the 9800 Pro.Quote:
Originally posted by adamp2p+28 January 2004 - 01:27--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (adamp2p @ 28 January 2004 - 01:27)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-Samurai@27 January 2004 - 18:15
Aqua Mark 3 Score
378/337 is R9800 pro. What do you have? A modded driver? Or the 9800 non pro? [/b][/quote]
Umm I'm just using the drivers that came with my system at the moment.
Does that mean I'm running it slower than it's capable of? How would I change these settings? Update driver?
My Graphics Card is: ATI RADEON 128MB 9800Pro
Umm I'm just using the drivers that came with my system at the moment.Quote:
Originally posted by Samurai+27 January 2004 - 20:53--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Samurai @ 27 January 2004 - 20:53)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>Quote:
Originally posted by adamp2p@28 January 2004 - 01:27
<!--QuoteBegin-Samurai
Quote:
Samurai, 324 / 290 MHz is not the correct default clock for the 9800 Pro.
378/337 is R9800 pro. What do you have? A modded driver? Or the 9800 non pro?
Does that mean I'm running it slower than it's capable of? How would I change these settings? Update driver?
My Graphics Card is: ATI RADEON 128MB 9800Pro [/b][/quote]
That's funny, I looked at the ATi website and read up on the 9800 NON PRO, and you have the exact clockspeeds as the 9800 NON PRO.
Read the fine print of the data set provided by the Aquamark3 ARC comparison link and it displays you CORE/MEM clock speeds.
You asked me in a PM to provide more information, and I will:
See this link
It says that the 9800 NON PRO has the clocks of 325/580. Remember to divide the memory clock by two to the memory clock and remember your card is double data rate (DDR)
580/2 = 290
You should download Rage3d tweak. You can overclock your card very nicely with that tool. If you really have an ATi 9800 Pro it should default to those speeds due to its BIOS. Otherwise someone may have ripped you off and sold you a 9800 NON PRO as a 9800 PRO. If you are sure your card is a 9800 Pro then I would just set it to the default speeds of the pro. To be sure you should open your case and write down the fine print you see on the RAM chips on your card. Type that in for us to evaluate and we will let you know just what your card is capable of.
Okay?
:D
:)
my shitty specs only gave me a score of just over 7000,
cant be fu*^ buying it (thats the way you give links to the results ay? you have to 'buy' /'download crack') .
you can just believe me when i say i got a shit result...
...will the 9600xt improve my score heaps or just a lil?
im upgrading the mobo as well
U don't need to buy the program to post results but buying it does enable the options to customise the tests.Quote:
Originally posted by dray_02@28 January 2004 - 13:25
my shitty specs only gave me a score of just over 7000,
cant be fu*^ buying it (thats the way you give links to the results ay? you have to 'buy' /'download crack') .
you can just believe me when i say i got a shit result...
...will the 9600xt improve my score heaps or just a lil?
im upgrading the mobo as well
I got 6800-odd so your system is less pitiful than mine mate!
Yeah, the Asus mobo and new gfx card should improve it, I'd have thought.
Wow, John...no artifacting there?Quote:
Originally posted by _John_Lennon_@28 January 2004 - 14:59
http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_view.php?run=878487675
36612
artifating? Define that.
But I noticed nothing unusual, im running at those setts currently.
NO, all you have to do is register...you do not have to crack anything...to register is free.Quote:
Originally posted by dray_02@28 January 2004 - 05:25
my shitty specs only gave me a score of just over 7000,
cant be fu*^ buying it (thats the way you give links to the results ay? you have to 'buy' /'download crack') .
you can just believe me when i say i got a shit result...
...will the 9600xt improve my score heaps or just a lil?
im upgrading the mobo as well
If I were you I would only run those settings when gaming, especially without any extra cooling.Quote:
Originally posted by _John_Lennon_@28 January 2004 - 15:13
artifating? Define that.
But I noticed nothing unusual, im running at those setts currently.
No artifacting..you must have found a sweet spot...
If I were you I would only run those settings when gaming, especially without any extra cooling.Quote:
Originally posted by adamp2p+28 January 2004 - 18:16--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (adamp2p @ 28 January 2004 - 18:16)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-_John_Lennon_@28 January 2004 - 15:13
artifating? Define that.
But I noticed nothing unusual, im running at those setts currently.
No artifacting..you must have found a sweet spot... [/b][/quote]
Yeah, much higher and the back ground colors for things start to wack out on my though, shading goes off when you move things, so thats about the limit on it.
not bad man! how does it recog ur cpu as 3200 when u have a 2500? i thought the cpu label is the same, w/e clock u have it in.Quote:
mine's in the link in my sig
Nope, the label is a 3200 all over my comp. DxDiag, system and all that stuff...it always is read as a 3200 lol thanks :)
did u tweak something to make it recog ur cpu as 3200? cuz i thought ur cpu has a Label that doesn't change no matter wat speed ur in. like mine. it says p4 2.4c when it's running at 3.2. :unsure:Quote:
Originally posted by bigdawgfoxx@22 February 2004 - 22:44
Nope, the label is a 3200 all over my comp. DxDiag, system and all that stuff...it always is read as a 3200 lol thanks :)
did u tweak something to make it recog ur cpu as 3200? cuz i thought ur cpu has a Label that doesn't change no matter wat speed ur in. like mine. it says p4 2.4c when it's running at 3.2. :unsure: [/b][/quote]Quote:
Originally posted by abu_has_the_power+23 February 2004 - 00:04--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (abu_has_the_power @ 23 February 2004 - 00:04)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-bigdawgfoxx@22 February 2004 - 22:44
Nope, the label is a 3200 all over my comp. DxDiag, system and all that stuff...it always is read as a 3200 lol thanks :)
nope, I have a 2500 as well and in Aida32 it recognizes it automatically as how fast it is compared to, ie 2800 or 3200
no tweaking, it's just automatic
maybe it only changes w/ AMD processors not intel?
nope, I have a 2500 as well and in Aida32 it recognizes it automatically as how fast it is compared to, ie 2800 or 3200Quote:
Originally posted by kaiweiler+22 February 2004 - 23:07--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (kaiweiler @ 22 February 2004 - 23:07)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>Quote:
Originally posted by abu_has_the_power@23 February 2004 - 00:04
<!--QuoteBegin-bigdawgfoxx
Quote:
@22 February 2004 - 22:44
Nope, the label is a 3200 all over my comp. DxDiag, system and all that stuff...it always is read as a 3200 lol thanks :)
did u tweak something to make it recog ur cpu as 3200? cuz i thought ur cpu has a Label that doesn't change no matter wat speed ur in. like mine. it says p4 2.4c when it's running at 3.2. :unsure:
no tweaking, it's just automatic
maybe it only changes w/ AMD processors not intel? [/b][/quote]
yea. prob. in cpu-z, mine says 2.4c, but it's running at 3.2. btw, i'm getting another 9600 soon. and i don't have to spend a penny. i'm doing it not cuz i need it, but i need tv out to work. so i'm just gonna buy a retail package that includes all the adapters and cables. like this one:
http://www.newegg.com/app/ViewProductDesc....talog=48&depa=1
how is it? any suggestions?
So, it looks like you finally figured out how to use the aquamark3 ARC. Pretty cool, eh? B)Quote:
Wow, 40,000 means 40 average frames per second. You have an excellent system. You should pat yourself on the back for getting it done for so cheap (that's using your noggin/using the resources available to you).
Keep in mind that Mad Cat's systemAthlon 64FX51 (which is at least twice as expensive as yours scored only around 46,000 = 46 frames per second). The only factor limiting your score now is your GPU. However, if I were you I would not complain about that...6 frames per second is a marginal increase for the money you spent...
:)
yuss i got 21,000 !!!
a big improvement from my previous score of 7,000 something
im happy :):):)
link? BTW, dray_02, did you ever get your sound thing to work?Quote:
Originally posted by dray_02@22 February 2004 - 20:35
yuss i got 21,000 !!!
a big improvement from my previous score of 7,000 something
im happy :):):)
nope not yet... ive tried every obvious thing there is!!!
ive downloaded about 4 different drivers... all of which you guys recommended..
anyhoo my score link
21450
dray_02: there is something up with your video card, and I haven't been able to figure it out yet. You say that you have a ATi Radeon 9600 XT, right? Well that's funny because your Aquamark3 ARC link says you don't.Quote:
Originally posted by dray_02@22 February 2004 - 20:54
nope not yet... ive tried every obvious thing there is!!!
ive downloaded about 4 different drivers... all of which you guys recommended..
anyhoo my score link
21450
It says that your core speed is 500, which is equivalent with the 9600 XT, but the memory speed that is reported by the operating system in your Aquamark3 link is 250 (250X2 = 500). By my calculation (and by ATi's, you don't have a 9600 XT (unless the clock is reported incorrectly, which I doubt). Do you have Rage3dtweak installed? If so, naviage to the overclocker tab and tell me what it reads as default.
;)
wow i can only look at the results and dream, i went to test my p.o.s. for kicks and it didnt even recognize the vid card.
:P Sorry mate i dont mean to laugh at you.Quote:
Originally posted by ApacNTS@23 February 2004 - 06:55
wow i can only look at the results and dream, i went to test my p.o.s. for kicks and it didnt even recognize the vid card.
Get a new card mate even the cheapest ones are pretty decent. :)
dray_02: there is something up with your video card, and I haven't been able to figure it out yet. You say that you have a ATi Radeon 9600 XT, right? Well that's funny because your Aquamark3 ARC link says you don't.Quote:
Originally posted by adamp2p+23 February 2004 - 19:20--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (adamp2p @ 23 February 2004 - 19:20)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-dray_02@22 February 2004 - 20:54
nope not yet... ive tried every obvious thing there is!!!
ive downloaded about 4 different drivers... all of which you guys recommended..
anyhoo my score link
21450
It says that your core speed is 500, which is equivalent with the 9600 XT, but the memory speed that is reported by the operating system in your Aquamark3 link is 250 (250X2 = 500). By my calculation (and by ATi's, you don't have a 9600 XT (unless the clock is reported incorrectly, which I doubt). Do you have Rage3dtweak installed? If so, naviage to the overclocker tab and tell me what it reads as default.
;) [/b][/quote]
you know what adam, you may be on to something....
i thort the xt was supose to run at 500/500
but according to rage3d tweak v 3.9b the default core and memory clock speeds are 500/250 respectively.....
what is going on????
does that mean i got sold a dud??? it was unopened, packged in a genuwine case, with hl2.... plz tell me tht i didnt get ripped off
arggh and accounding to that link you sent me
radeon 9600 series comparison
my memory clock should be on 600!!!!!!!!!!!!!! WWTF,... thats pretty darn high....
the most i can overclock the memory core on rage3d tweak (without testing to see if it is stable or not) is 324!!!
:angry:
thats less than the radeon 9600 se