Re: Vatican plan to block gay priests
Quote:
Originally Posted by whypikonme
But, since the Church still regards the main purpose of sex to be procreation, they insist that any ethical sexual act must be open to conception.
Since there isn't a 100% method of contraception, I'm presuming that you're talking pish.
A combination pill is something like 98% so technically a sexual act while using this form of contraception is still open to conception, albeit to a lesser degree - yet I'm sure that the Catholic church doesn't advocate this.
Re: Vatican plan to block gay priests
Quote:
Originally Posted by manker
Quote:
Originally Posted by whypikonme
But, since the Church still regards the main purpose of sex to be procreation, they insist that any ethical sexual act must be open to conception.
Since there isn't a 100% method of contraception, I'm presuming that you're talking pish.
A combination pill is something like 98% so technically a sexual act while using this form of contraception is still open to conception, albeit to a lesser degree - yet I'm sure that the Catholic church doesn't advocate this.
Oh FFS stop thinking, "google" stuff from the interweb then put your own spin on it. That's the ticket.
Re: Vatican plan to block gay priests
what's with the anti google sentiment? :(
Re: Vatican plan to block gay priests
Quote:
Originally Posted by GepperRankins
what's with the anti google sentiment? :(
Googling for statistics or something, is fine.
Googling for an opinion because you lack one yourself is teh suck.
That's the way I see it :lookaroun
Re: Vatican plan to block gay priests
Re: Vatican plan to block gay priests
Quote:
Originally Posted by manker
Quote:
Originally Posted by whypikonme
But, since the Church still regards the main purpose of sex to be procreation, they insist that any ethical sexual act must be open to conception.
Since there isn't a 100% method of contraception, I'm presuming that you're talking pish.
A combination pill is something like 98% so technically a sexual act while using this form of contraception is still open to conception, albeit to a lesser degree - yet I'm sure that the Catholic church doesn't advocate this.
l take it you're referring to the owner of those words when you make that remark Manky, you wouldn't just be looking for another excuse to insult someone, would you?
Re: Vatican plan to block gay priests
Quote:
Originally Posted by Busyman
So I take it that there is no sin by members of the Catholic Church. What's the point of church then? :dry:
Members of the Catholic church are allowed to sin all they want Busy, as long as they confess, this was why so many converted when the Romans made the religion up. So in a way you're right, there is no sin Catholics cannot commit without being forgiven by the church. In a way, it's a bit like Devil worship, isn't it?
Re: Vatican plan to block gay priests
Quote:
Originally Posted by whypikonme
Quote:
Originally Posted by manker
Since there isn't a 100% method of contraception, I'm presuming that you're talking pish.
A combination pill is something like 98% so technically a sexual act while using this form of contraception is still open to conception, albeit to a lesser degree - yet I'm sure that the Catholic church doesn't advocate this.
l take it you're referring to the owner of those words when you make that remark Manky, you wouldn't just be looking for another excuse to insult someone, would you?
I don't need an excuse but posting someone else's pish normally does it for me. Thanks for that.
Taking the time to google and copy/paste drivel is just as reprehensible as making it up and posting it yourself.
Re: Vatican plan to block gay priests
Quote:
Originally Posted by manker
Taking the time to google and copy/paste drivel is just as reprehensible as making it up and posting it yourself.
So why do you do it then?
You should stick to your grammar-nazi persona, at least we know where we stand then.
Re: Vatican plan to block gay priests
Quote:
Originally Posted by whypikonme
Quote:
Originally Posted by manker
Taking the time to google and copy/paste drivel is just as reprehensible as making it up and posting it yourself.
So why do you do it then?
You should stick to your grammar-nazi persona, at least we know where we stand then.
You posted drivel, so I pointed out that it was drivel.
Remember:
Quote:
Originally Posted by manker
Quote:
Originally Posted by whypikonme
But, since the Church still regards the main purpose of sex to be procreation, they insist that any ethical sexual act must be open to conception.
Since there isn't a 100% method of contraception, I'm presuming that you're talking pish.
A combination pill is something like 98% so technically a sexual act while using this form of contraception is still open to conception, albeit to a lesser degree - yet I'm sure that the Catholic church doesn't advocate this.
Please, feel free to do the same, should I ever post drivel akin to that.
I wouldn't expect any less and certainly wouldn't try to skirt around the point - as you appear to be doing.
