Re: New Evolution spat in U.S. schools goes to court
It must have slipped your mind.
Re: New Evolution spat in U.S. schools goes to court
Quote:
Originally Posted by JPaul
Quote:
Originally Posted by peat moss
No I started this thread as a parent and put up with BS to get an understanding what a child must go thru , who are you to move my thread ?
Like fuck they'll will move it !
I had though my use of the word "gepulon" would have indicated the jocular nature of my post.
Language only works well when one considers not only the words used, but also the order and context in which they are placed.
My apologies for any offence re "your" thread. I realize it must be precious to you. So as to avoid confusion, the previous sentence had an element of sarcasm attached to it.
Please accept my apology JP , I did n't mean to sound like such an asshole or claim a thread as mine. Just tired I guess , I read it wrong and should learn to spell better . :blushing:
I think when you have three little ones in school , topics like these hit a little harder mabye ?
Re: New Evolution spat in U.S. schools goes to court
No old bean, please accept my apologies, my retort was uncalled for and harsh.
I do know how you feel tho'. I have four, aged 20, 17, 12 and 7. Three still at school and one working but staying at home.
I have had at least one child in school for the last 15 years, two for the last 12 years, three for the last 7 years.
It is highly likely that it will be another 10 years before I am a school free zone. Not counting tertiary education.
Loike I said, I know how you feel.
Re: New Evolution spat in U.S. schools goes to court
Quote:
Originally Posted by JPaul
The nucleotide sequence of repeated sequence I, which appears in five regions on nylon oligomer-degrading plasmid pOAD2, harbored in Flavobacterium sp. strain K172, was determined. The five regions of repeated sequence I had 880 bp of identical sequence, and the sequence was identical to that of IS6100, an insertion sequence classified in the IS6 family, initially found in Mycobacterium fortuitum. Sequences homologous to that of IS6100 were found for another nylon oligomer- degrading plasmid, pNAD2, harbored in Pseudomonas sp. strain NK87, by Southern hybridization experiments.
This is simply the greatest paragraph ever! :cool:
What does it mean? :unsure:
Re: New Evolution spat in U.S. schools goes to court
Some bactria can eat cheap clothes.
Re: New Evolution spat in U.S. schools goes to court
Quote:
Originally Posted by JPaul
Some bactria can eat cheap clothes.
Like moths, only smaller and more tenacious. :)
Re: New Evolution spat in U.S. schools goes to court
Quote:
Originally Posted by j2k4
Quote:
Originally Posted by JPaul
Some bactria can eat cheap clothes.
Like moths, only smaller and more tenacious. :)
And with an "e" in bacteria. :blushing:
Re: New Evolution spat in U.S. schools goes to court
Quote:
Originally Posted by JPaul
Quote:
Originally Posted by j2k4
Like moths, only smaller and more tenacious. :)
And with an "e" in bacteria. :blushing:
I had, perhaps prematurely, ceded spelling discipline on the board to manker.
He is not doing himself credit on this point.
I am seriously re-considering his tenure thus, even though I myself commited a particularly egregious error this past weekend.
Re: New Evolution spat in U.S. schools goes to court
Quote:
Originally Posted by j2k4
even though I myself commited a particularly egregious error this past weekend.
You mean that "Delay in '08" tattoo you just got?
Pshaw...nobody will notice that.
Re: New Evolution spat in U.S. schools goes to court
Quote:
Originally Posted by Busyman
Kill him. KILL HIM. kiLl HimM!!!!!
l've always thought of you as rather childish and immature, after reading your viewing habits in another thread, l now know l was right. All this big man, gun-toting rhetoric of yours is just a front. l don't know much about the US education system, but l'm guessing 9th grade? 10th?
Quote:
Originally Posted by j2k4
In what incarnations have you read my posts "...over the past couple of years or so..."?
Quite easy really, l looked here.
Here's a part of your very first post, telling us how dangerous Saddam was with his WMDs.
Quote:
Originally Posted by j2k4
WE NEED TO REMOVE SADDAM NOW, BEFORE THE POTENTIAL FOR DESTRUCTION BECOMES EVEN GREATER. THOSE WHO DOUBT THAT THE POTENTIAL IS ESCALATING AS WE DEBATE THIS ARE KIDDING THEMSELVES.
Who's kidding who now? :lol:
