What Trackers Are Worth [With Reviews and Ratings] Part 1

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Patriot foreve

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Corey

"well,i have and it really sucks"
You don't see the point, this is about rarity of invite! not quality of tracker

---

it already has the highest ranking,what more can it get ?

so u wanna put it alone in 1 category so what's worth it if we wanna trade?

may be acouple of SCTs and FBs will do for alame tracker like UK-T :D :D :D

i don't think it really should be more over-rated but let's stay and wait for guys in here to say more opinions about that :)

---

Haven't we been stating this for a while now?:huh:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Shadowfire

Moreover, a 6-pt scale for worth is unnecessary because of the complexity it creates. Really, I think the x.5s have already gone halfway overboard. My view is that this thread shouldn't be about the dissection of invites' worth. It should just be a more or less rough idea for trade purposes, coupled with descriptions of various trackers (<- those of which Patriot foreve and Buggyme are doing right now). Already, I've observed people worshipping this thread like the invites god. So what if a site isn't listed on here? So what if you offer a site that's one level less than what you want? Nothing. This thread doesn't spoonfeed you trade values. You also have to think on them in terms of your own needs and the stuff that's available for you to trade. The key phrases of this thread are "THIS LIST SHOULD NOT BE TAKEN TOO LITERALLY. Its just to figure where each site stands (rarity-wise)".

---

yup

i dont think the scale matters so much if reviews are included

decide for yourself what you need and are willing to trade to get

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Shadowfire

Moreover, a 6-pt scale for worth is unnecessary because of the complexity it creates. Really, I think the x.5s have already gone halfway overboard. My view is that this thread shouldn't be about the dissection of invites' worth. It should just be a more or less rough idea for trade purposes, coupled with descriptions of various trackers (<- those of which Patriot foreve and Buggyme are doing right now). Already, I've observed people worshipping this thread like the invites god. So what if a site isn't listed on here? So what if you offer a site that's one level less than what you want? Nothing. This thread doesn't spoonfeed you trade values. You also have to think on them in terms of your own needs and the stuff that's available for you to trade. The key phrases of this thread are "THIS LIST SHOULD NOT BE TAKEN TOO LITERALLY. Its just to figure where each site stands (rarity-wise)".

---

Lol ... that post shud be entitled what the thread "What Invites Are Worth" is worth. And yeah I totally agree that ppl shudnt take this too literally. For one this isnt like stamps or coins where all the accounts and invites are valuable. At the end of the day, there are only so many accounts one can use, and it is fairly impossible and incredible waste of time to juggle too many accounts. Also, takin every point too literally puts incredible pressure on buggyme and patriot to make sure, they have figured out things exactly, a task which is in itself impossible.

now i must get CZone

revolutiontt more stars, is a great site :D 3.5 for example

thanks Patriot foreve well done

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DrReD

revolutiontt more stars, is a great site :D 3.5 for example

---

yeah,it's good but u can get it for free in here :) ,so i think it stays the same as it is now

My 3 cents about ranks:

ThePlace has disabled invites, so none are available. That should make it more rare, it has rare/obscure content and decent speeds. Why is it only 2.5?

BitMeTV requires 65GB upload to make PU, while BitMe requires 25GB and OiNK requires only 10GB. Also BitMETV seems more valuable when trading, why not make it 3.5?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by manofstyle

My 3 cents about ranks:

ThePlace has disabled invites, so none are available. That should make it more rare, it has rare/obscure content and decent speeds. Why is it only 2.5?

BitMeTV requires 65GB upload to make PU, while BitMe requires 25GB and OiNK requires only 10GB. Also BitMETV seems more valuable when trading, why not make it 3.5?

---

they're more rare as you get banned for inviting cheaters

http://i2.tinypic.com/4trhtvd.jpg

This is a great tracker that was formed for the seduction/pickup artist community but now offers much more.

ThePlace is difficult to get into now because most invites are disabled, and only a few select people have them.

It is a specialized tracker with a focus on Pickup (PUA), but also good selection of Self-Improvement, Dating, Sex, NLP, Magic, Motivation, and more.

Much of the content is exlusive that you will not find anywhere else. The forums are active and very good. A lot of new exclusive releases come from group buys in the forum, so if you want to find people to pitch in on some cool stuff this is a good place to ask. The tracker has a strong community of good users.

Max users 4000
Registered Enabled Users 3228
Registered users 5217
Unconfirmed users 9
Torrents 6,538
Peers 18,501
Seeders 17,570
Leechers 931
Seeder/leecher ratio 1887%


Categories:
Seduction / Dating
Dance / Singing / Voice
Fashion / Clothing / Grooming
Fighting / Martial Arts
Food / Drink / Cooking
Health / Fitness / Massage
Hypnotism / NLP
Languages / Accents
Magic / Illusions / Tricks
Psychology / Body Language
Sex

All users can upload, and content is not scene but from users. They have a lot of exclusive content, often coming form group buys. The forums and community are very good, you can learn a lot there. Speeds are decent, nothing spectacular but not slow.

Ratings:
Content 5/5 (considering the narrow scope of categories)
Speed 3.5/5
Rarity 4.5/5 (no invites)
Pre Times N/A