AVG, it fails hardcore with detection
Printable View
AVG, it fails hardcore with detection
symantec, it consistently hogs up resources and locks your pc down so much that programs dont work.
mcafee
defintely say mcafee. but, norton is right up there.
McAfee was the worst av i have ever used !!!
It slowed down my computer horribly every time it did a scan or updated or even when the the windows starts it took usually about 4-6 min. to just get past the welcome page !! really hate it !:@:@
Norton :)
I have tried macfee norton synaptec kaspersky micorsoft security essentials all recently new releases and I dont like having any. they all cause bad computer slowdowns and I still have had problems with viruses and junk with them. When i had protection it was like having a radar detector i thought i could push the limit and I still got caught out. So now I run bareback and just pay attention to the portals i dip my tool into. So the worst is having one and the best is using your brain and asking is it a good idea to d/l this. if this was a girl that was rumored to hav the herp would it still be worth the risk... and sometimes when i'm desparate i click anyway and yes it ends up in an aw F, time to reformat.
I see some responses that norton is the worst antivirus . Norton is pretty decent nowadays . It used to be a resource hog but it got better . It's light and efficient but not as light as eset of course .
On the other hand f-secure is really really bad .
norton is useless.
avast antivirus