Emule or Torrents

I want it to be alive, you try to kill it.
P2P is based on upload, not on download.

So it's, at least, more mine than yours.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Tuxman

I want it to be alive, you try to kill it.

---

I don't even use eMule. Or torrents. Or P2P. :idunno:

So what is your problem then?

Well, you're talking to me as if I used P2P and leeched 24/7 without uploading anything, or coded those eMule leecher mods. At least that's the impression I get. Both statements are false. Just thought I'd make that clear. Cheers.

well i used emule few years back for few rare tracks...well emule is slow as a fuck...i installed a tweaked version of emule...i was able to catch 400-500 kb/s
torrent & warez extremly fast :D

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by johhny

well emule is slow as a fuck... (...) torrent & warez extremly fast :D

---

1. "Warez" is not a P2P network.
2. You don't have any fucking clue about how P2P works.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by johhny

i installed a tweaked version of emule...i was able to catch 400-500 kb/s

---

Just curious, which version was it? If you don't want to say it here feel free to PM :) Because there are many non-leecher mods that are significantly faster than the vanilla eMule.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Tuxman

1. "Warez" is not a P2P network.
2. You don't have any fucking clue about how P2P works.

---

1. some people call file hosters "warez", although that's an incorrect term.
2. so if eMule isn't blazing fast for people, they don't have a fucking clue about how P2P works? :unsure:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by anon-sbi

1. some people call file hosters "warez", although that's an incorrect term.

---

"OCH is faster than eMule!!1" --> no fucking clue about how P2P works. (Besides that, non-premium Uploading.to etc. are significantly slower than eMule.)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by anon-sbi

2. so if eMule isn't blazing fast for people, they don't have a fucking clue about how P2P works? :unsure:

---

People who say $P2PNetworkA would be "faster" than $P2PNetworkB don't have a clue about what their DL speed depends on, so: Yep.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Tuxman

"OCH is faster than eMule!!1" --> no fucking clue about how P2P works. (Besides that, non-premium Uploading.to etc. are significantly slower than eMule.)

---

And Mediafire is lightning fast. It's all about which hosters we're talking about.

Quote:

---

People who say $P2PNetworkA would be "faster" than $P2PNetworkB don't have a clue about what their DL speed depends on, so: Yep.

---

Maybe they don't want to go to the effort of making those conditions proper when that's done largely more transparently on $P2PNetworkB. :unsure:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by anon-sbi

It's all about which hosters we're talking about.

---

You can't take hosters as a comparison object for P2P networks. (Well, you can, but...)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by anon-sbi

Maybe they don't want to go to the effort of making those conditions proper when that's done largely more transparently on $P2PNetworkB. :unsure:

---

Which does not falsify my thesis, does it?