Printable View
i never doubted and i never kissed ass :)Quote:
Originally posted by RGX@15 January 2004 - 21:08
I was laughing a load in this thread, you all doubted, he proved, and then you all kissed ass :P
i just prefer the aquamark link because you can actually see what overclocks there are (if any)
I was just getting tired of the BS'ers around here; I was tired of reading their associated garbage posts, so I thought it was about time somebody tidied up around here and called them on their shit. I suspected that a few were honest, but not all of them.
Note how simple it is to take a screenshot. It does not take very much intelligence, you see. Also note how elaborate some member's avatars are as well (these folks obviously know how to use the internet, use benchmarking software utilities, upload screenshots).
But when it comes down to the wire, and some of these bufoons are called to defend their claim--(I am sorry you guys, it has nothing to do with repuations; it has to do with the mere fact that some people actually contrive total bullshit to spam on this forum; they fabricate systems they do not own, and they think we are as dumb as they are)--they realize they can't prove a lie. So the real issue is accountability. I personally respect people who know the value of proof. It is present in mathematics and physics more than any other field simply because the laws of nature are built upon several premises which must be stated before making any claim. Such as 1 is greater than zero, and if x is greater than 1, then x plus one is greater than one plus zero.
This is, as far as I know, a hardware forum, which is supposed to be a place to discuss hardware. Now, if we have a forum where the members somehow think that zero is greater than one, what kind of discussions do you anticipate we would have?
I think I have made my point.
QED. :)
well said :)Quote:
Originally posted by adamp2p@15 January 2004 - 21:26
I was just getting tired of the BS'ers around here; I was tired of reading their associated garbage posts, so I thought it was about time somebody tidied up around here and called them on their shit. I suspected that a few were honest, but not all of them.
Note how simple it is to take a screenshot. It does not take very much intelligence, you see. Also note how elaborate some member's avatars are as well (these folks obviously know how to use the internet, use benchmarking software utilities, upload screenshots).
But when it comes down to the wire, and some of these bufoons are called to defend their claim--(I am sorry you guys, it has nothing to do with repuations; it has to do with the mere fact that some people actually contrive total bullshit to spam on this forum; they fabricate systems they do not own, and they think we are as dumb as they are)--they realize they can't prove a lie. So the real issue is accountability. I personally respect people who know the value of proof. It is present in mathematics and physics more than any other field simply because the laws of nature are built upon several premises which must be stated before making any claim. Such as 1 is greater than zero, and if x is greater than 1, then x plus one is greater than one plus zero.
This is, as far as I know, a hardware forum, which is supposed to be a place to discuss hardware. Now, if we have a forum where the members somehow think that zero is greater than one, what kind of discussions do you anticipate we would have?
I think I have made my point.
QED. :)
i'm just away off for a drive in my mclaren...or what about the zonda...hmmm...?
well said :)Quote:
Originally posted by 4th gen+15 January 2004 - 23:31--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (4th gen @ 15 January 2004 - 23:31)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-adamp2p@15 January 2004 - 21:26
I was just getting tired of the BS'ers around here; I was tired of reading their associated garbage posts, so I thought it was about time somebody tidied up around here and called them on their shit. I suspected that a few were honest, but not all of them.
Note how simple it is to take a screenshot. It does not take very much intelligence, you see. Also note how elaborate some member's avatars are as well (these folks obviously know how to use the internet, use benchmarking software utilities, upload screenshots).
But when it comes down to the wire, and some of these bufoons are called to defend their claim--(I am sorry you guys, it has nothing to do with repuations; it has to do with the mere fact that some people actually contrive total bullshit to spam on this forum; they fabricate systems they do not own, and they think we are as dumb as they are)--they realize they can't prove a lie. So the real issue is accountability. I personally respect people who know the value of proof. It is present in mathematics and physics more than any other field simply because the laws of nature are built upon several premises which must be stated before making any claim. Such as 1 is greater than zero, and if x is greater than 1, then x plus one is greater than one plus zero.
This is, as far as I know, a hardware forum, which is supposed to be a place to discuss hardware. Now, if we have a forum where the members somehow think that zero is greater than one, what kind of discussions do you anticipate we would have?
I think I have made my point.
QED. :)
i'm just away off for a drive in my mclaren...or what about the zonda...hmmm...? [/b][/quote]
:lol:
You are all too funny, my friend.
On binary, they just indicate on or offQuote:
Originally posted by adamp2p@15 January 2004 - 15:26
Such as 1 is greater than zero
And that's hardware-related ;)
I don't have any problem with you wanting me to prove it really, I'm just annoyed that you kept on saying it after I requested how to post an Aquamark link over and over.
DWk, wouldn't binary be software really?
I thought you would enjoy the Aquamark3 ARC. Is it not nice?Quote:
Originally posted by Mad Cat@15 January 2004 - 23:45
I don't have any problem with you wanting me to prove it really, I'm just annoyed that you kept on saying it after I requested how to post an Aquamark link over and over.
DWk, wouldn't binary be software really?
I said hardware-related. And if you don't know, you use binary in electronics ;)
and if you don't believe me...that IS hardware :rolleyes:
I thought you would enjoy the Aquamark3 ARC. Is it not nice? [/b][/quote]Quote:
Originally posted by adamp2p+15 January 2004 - 22:48--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (adamp2p @ 15 January 2004 - 22:48)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-Mad Cat@15 January 2004 - 23:45
I don't have any problem with you wanting me to prove it really, I'm just annoyed that you kept on saying it after I requested how to post an Aquamark link over and over.
DWk, wouldn't binary be software really?
No, its just that I didn't know exactly where to go into it to find a link exactly to my benchmark.
Binary is the method by which the processor processes data.........
Who thinks that isnt hardware?