Sikh School To Be Built In Slough, England.

Or Liberal? ;)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Mr JP Fugley

no point mate, we are wrong they are right, that is all.

it matters not one jot that it is our children, our country and our taxes.

if we vary from their opinion of right then we must be wrong.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Busyman

I agree though that if the UK likes it that way, so be it.

---

Uh, yeah, whatever. :dry:

It seems we were forming our own opinion and you may not like it.
I can form an opinion about prostitution in Vegas even though I live Washington DC.

So yes, you're wrong, yup that's right. ;)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by UKResident

Ah, the personal stuff, this must mean you've run out of ideas then, good.

---

It means you've proven yourself a shit googler and lack common sense.

I put forth the opinion that Sikhmorningprayerteachingideologywhateverthefuck shouldn't be in schools funded by government.

It's called a Sikh school for a reason, I imagine.

I also said that paying 90% to get 10% is selling out and further with the 50% of ongoing education. It obviously works, numbers wise.

Someone mentioned the Coca-Cola thing in America...that's selling out to. The problem is I remember soda machines in high school so if it's Coke instead of Shasta and they want to pay the school that's very different.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Mr JP Fugley

no point mate, we are wrong they are right, that is all.

it matters not one jot that it is our children, our country and our taxes.

if we vary from their opinion of right then we must be wrong.

---

Actually, I thought I posted that if is alright with the UK, so be it.

I just disagree.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by hobbes

Actually, I thought I posted that if is alright with the UK, so be it.

I just disagree.

---

You did.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by hobbes

This is my opinion, if the people in the UK are happy, that is their choice, but one I disagree with.

---

I agreed with you.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Busyman

It means you've proven yourself a shit googler and lack common sense.

---

:lol:

An oasis in a rather dry thread.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Busyman

It means you've proven yourself a shit googler and lack common sense.

I also said that paying 90% to get 10% is selling out and further with the 50% of ongoing education. It obviously works, numbers wise.
.

---

No, what it proves is your total lack of ability to understand economic principles.

l explained quite cleary about how the 90% grant is paid back, with interest. l also explained how the 50% running costs save the government money. So the problem here isn't me, it's your lack of understanding of quite simple principles.

Might l suggest you try harder to read and understand what we are striving to teach you.

(2/10, must try harder)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by UKResident

No, what it proves is your total lack of ability to understand economic principles.

l explained quite cleary about how the 90% grant is paid back, with interest. l also explained how the 50% running costs save the government money. So the problem here isn't me, it's your lack of understanding of quite simple principles.

Might l suggest you try harder to read and understand what we are striving to teach you.

(2/10, must try harder)

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Busyman

It obviously works, numbers wise.

---

Where's the lack of understanding? The fact the governement saves money was never in dispute. It's obviously based on numbers and not principle.

You obviously can't read English even though you might be.......English. :dry:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Busyman

Where's the lack of understanding? The fact the governement saves money was never in dispute. It's obviously based on numbers and not principle.

You obviously can't read English even though you might be.......English. :dry:

---

If it was never in dispute then why is the crux of your argument this 90\10 bullshit? Just admit you were wrong, or isn't that in your American vocabulary?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by UKResident

If it was never in dispute then why is the crux of your argument this 90\10 bullshit? Just admit you were wrong, or isn't that in your American vocabulary?

---

The 90/10 is pertinent since it proves that money matters first and foremost in the education of the children over putting specific religion in schools.

Never in dispute means that I didn't say there wasn't a money savings. You need reading comprehension classes or better glasses because your lack of "getting it" makes you smell like many asses.

Ween yourself off the heroin and drop down to cocaine.

You don't even know the difference between 60's segregation and so-called 2K segregation, which is a misnomer.

Defending your educational system is one thing but this ridiculous. :dry: