Homos!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by JPaul

Not only do I not find man on man action a turn on. I find it exactly the reverse. I have had the misfortune of seeing a few seconds of it and did not enjoy it one bit.

I have no problem with the male form and can see how it can be aesthetically pleasing. However any form of sex act, not my viewing choice.

Having said that, I find the image posted by busyman to be unattracive as well. Those are definitely manlegs.

---

:lol: :lol: :lol:

Women that wear high heels tend to them type of legs.....that and working out a wee bit.

You must take a look at some a doze female bodybuilders...those are manlegs.

The previous pic above is just in shape legs.

no, they're hideous rugby player legs

Well, I knew it was only a matter of time before this thread took a different turn. And more as a friendly reminder: Keep it civil folks. ;)

As for your liking "phat ass," Busyman, it's more biologically based. Large hips and thighs (amoung other things) on a woman indicate fertility. It's no modern revelation; the Venus of Willdendorf dates from around 30,000 BC.

http://docentes.uacj.mx/fgomez/museo...25000%20ac.jpg

And the obligatory Rubens reference:

http://www.abcgallery.com/R/rubens/rubens60.jpg

:shuriken:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Proper Bo

no, they're hideous rugby player legs

---

:lol: :lol: :lol:

http://www.abstracthiphop.com/hip-ho...boy_shorts.jpg

That was just that picture. You must like petite woman. Voluptuous ain't yo thang.

no there's nothing wrong with a round arse and nice sized pair of tits, but legs bigger than mine is just wrong!

Have you met my friend?

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v1...doobie/eye.gif

He enjoys homos...

http://filesharingtalk.com/vb3/showthread.php?t=105423



http://filesharingtalk.com/vb3/showt...24#post1164224


http://filesharingtalk.com/vb3/showthread.php?t=105513

http://filesharingtalk.com/vb3/showt...79#post1166579



Homographs and the occasional homonyms.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Busyman

I apologize for my previous remarks.:)

---

All of them? :O

Have you met my friend?

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v1...doobie/eye.gif

He enjoys homos...

http://filesharingtalk.com/vb3/showthread.php?t=105423



http://filesharingtalk.com/vb3/showt...24#post1164224


http://filesharingtalk.com/vb3/showthread.php?t=105513

http://filesharingtalk.com/vb3/showt...79#post1166579



Homographs and the occasional homonyms.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MagicNakor

Well, I knew it was only a matter of time before this thread took a different turn. And more as a friendly reminder: Keep it civil folks. ;)

As for your liking "phat ass," Busyman, it's more biologically based. Large hips and thighs (amoung other things) on a woman indicate fertility. It's no modern revelation; the Venus of Willdendorf dates from around 30,000 BC.

http://docentes.uacj.mx/fgomez/museo...25000%20ac.jpg

And the obligatory Rubens reference:

http://www.abcgallery.com/R/rubens/rubens60.jpg

:shuriken:

---

:sick:

I understand what you say about fertility n' all dat. I don't like phat ass, curvy hips and dem fine ass tittays 'cause I want to have baby.

I know you going to say that's the underlying reason and all scholarly and whatnot but it just ain't.:ermm:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Barbarossa

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Busyman

I apologize for my previous remarks.:)

---

All of them? :O

---

Of course not, Barbara.:dry:

It's that context of the post doohicky ya gotta pay attention to.