Printable View
I dont think so BH is no where close as rare as FSC or NB so if BH moves to level 7 then FSC and NB need a level change..Quote:
Originally Posted by Primosz
SCN is not as easy to get if compared to all the trackers at level 2 & 3 e.g. TorrentLeeh is level 2 do u really think you can get into SCN as quickly as TorrentLeech
bithumen should be lvl6. The lvl4 rating is a joke :sick:. Noone will trade bithumen for lvl4. :noes:
A: I have RMVB invite and looking for BitHUman, who wanna trade?
B: I do!!
nahh that dosent sounds right XD
i must agree, it should be ranked like nCore, no one will trade it for even a level 6Quote:
Originally Posted by tupac
You can saw daily posts like this on other boards:Quote:
Originally Posted by PoOki
"Want Bitmetv, Oink. Have SCT,FTN,UK-T." They are scammers.
Give me some link to bithumen trades like that on the FST board. Here are far less scammers.
Quote:
Originally Posted by tupacYou can saw daily posts like this on other boards:Quote:
Originally Posted by PoOki
"Want Bitmetv, Oink. Have SCT,FTN,UK-T." They are scammers.
Give me some link to bithumen trades like that on the FST board. Here are far less scammers.
Im just trying to say that bitHUman should be at higher level ;)
BH Level 4 , abig lol
the threads which Patriot made gonna destroy this WiAw Topic !
soo many Fu***** n00bs :lol:
Patriot destroy wiaw topic my friend
ncore level 6
bH level 4
SCN level 5
dont be silly
SCN level 2 or 3 very easy to get invite
bH very hard to get invite level 7 or 8
ncore should be level 8 very hard to get invite
I agree that the WIAW should be destroyed and new rating system should be put in place. But simply because rarity means nothing. I don't care how rare it's to get UK-T or FTWR. I don't want them. If you people want to know which trackers are the best ones for certain stuff. Look for the awards thread that was created. It tells which trackers are the best at certain categories and the top level trackers were not even mentioned.
Primosz there was a huge discussion about changing the rating system already and it was decided to keep it the way it is.
Too bad, anyway. it needs to be changed.Quote:
Originally Posted by saulin
RPi - Level 5, signups closed again
XWT - Level 1, open signups
Filemp3 - Level 1, open signups
HDBITS.ro - Level 1, open signups
@Primosz, don't be silly mate, nCore is where it should be, bH should be 6-7 and SCN invites can't be easy to get because they are off for users, only staff can use them at the moment
LOL :rolleyes:Quote:
Originally Posted by mikechrobot
Have you seen anybody trading nCore for another lvl6 tracker? :P nCore is usually traded for lvl8. So, nCore should be lvl8.
:noes:Quote:
Originally Posted by kokooyes manQuote:
Originally Posted by tupac
ncore must be level 8:D
Quote:
Originally Posted by Primosz
:noes:
also Czone very hard to get inv.
2 TB for 1 inv.
DDDN ok man I will give if you think ncore dont worth level 8 I will give you FB invite or Czone invite.
ncore definitely level 8
DDDN wait for your pm. Ncore for FB or Czone
Quote:
Originally Posted by Primosz
although that i personally think that some trackers ranking especially those who voted in the polls aren't in their correct position because for example no one will trade bH for alvl 4 and those who voted for it at alower level or ahigher lvl knows exactly they can't get it with alvl 4 and the same with some others
so i decided to use the open polls threads because alot have critizied me of manipulating the WIAW according to what i just think and that the thread only takes my own opinion in the rankings and whatever members what i just rank the trackers as i want
although that's not the truth but i said let's make it public and members vote on polls sothat none can say any single shit since it's the majority of votes ,although that may lead to some inaccurate results as thsoe who have the tracker will rank it high and those who don't have it will rank it low but even when it's ranked in awrong position and when they want to trade it with the same rank they wouldn't be able to and they will suggest it to be higher or lower depending on the tracker
According to the polls ,SCN will be ranked higher than bH and it's the same what happened with RTS where the polls rated it as lvl 5 but luckily during the poll a secret signup link was leaked so it was ranked as 2 since it was technically open
These ratings will fix themselves after awhile when those who gave false voting realize what was done
:yup:Quote:
Originally Posted by Patriot foreveQuote:
Originally Posted by Primosz
although that i personally think that some trackers ranking especially those who voted in the polls aren't in their correct position because for example no one will trade bH for alvl 4 and those who voted for it at alower level or ahigher lvl knows exactly they can't get it with alvl 4 and the same with some others
so i decided to use the open polls threads because alot have critizied me of manipulating the WIAW according to what i just think and that the thread only takes my own opinion in the rankings and whatever members what i just rank the trackers as i want
although that's not the truth but i said let's make it public and members vote on polls sothat none can say any single shit since it's the majority of votes ,although that may lead to some inaccurate results as thsoe who have the tracker will rank it high and those who don't have it will rank it low but even when it's ranked in awrong position and when they want to trade it with the same rank they wouldn't be able to and they will suggest it to be higher or lower depending on the tracker
According to the polls ,SCN will be ranked higher than bH and it's the same what happened with RTS where the polls rated it as lvl 5 but luckily during the poll a secret signup link was leaked so it was ranked as 2 since it was technically open
These ratings will fix themselves after awhile when those who gave false voting realize what was done
EXACTLY WORD BY WORD!Quote:
Originally Posted by Patriot foreveQuote:
Originally Posted by Primosz
although that i personally think that some trackers ranking especially those who voted in the polls aren't in their correct position because for example no one will trade bH for alvl 4 and those who voted for it at alower level or ahigher lvl knows exactly they can't get it with alvl 4 and the same with some others
so i decided to use the open polls threads because alot have critizied me of manipulating the WIAW according to what i just think and that the thread only takes my own opinion in the rankings and whatever members what i just rank the trackers as i want
although that's not the truth but i said let's make it public and members vote on polls sothat none can say any single shit since it's the majority of votes ,although that may lead to some inaccurate results as thsoe who have the tracker will rank it high and those who don't have it will rank it low but even when it's ranked in awrong position and when they want to trade it with the same rank they wouldn't be able to and they will suggest it to be higher or lower depending on the tracker
According to the polls ,SCN will be ranked higher than bH and it's the same what happened with RTS where the polls rated it as lvl 5 but luckily during the poll a secret signup link was leaked so it was ranked as 2 since it was technically open
These ratings will fix themselves after awhile when those who gave false voting realize what was done
Couldn't told it better...
And i just want to say to Patriot Forever That you doing great job here and i don't know if u realize what responsibility (although it's only trackers) you take and what ur influence is in the trading invite issue...
I Personally respect you a lot and respect your opinion and hard work!!!
i Myself didn't vote in the pools cause i know that in the end th time will decide what rank should tracker be... although i had some of the unranked trackers -->still i didn't vote(nor high or low) cause i don't believe in they result due to what you mentioned...
So TNX FOR THE GOOD WORK AND I THINK EVERYBODY ELSE START RESPECT THE WORK YOU DOING HERE...
Patriot I think you are doing grate job. I voted to according to my conscience. I vote to example ncore to level 8 although that I dont have account. I dont know that ncore should be to level 8. Maybe higher or lover.
I have some idea. Maybe decisions on which level tracker ought to be, should be taken by persons who are registered more than a year and they have more than 60 rep points.
nopQuote:
Originally Posted by Primosz
better idea is..something like a panel!..few trusted members...who decide the level of trackers..that woudl be way better..and would stop the critisism on PF..and make it alot easier for him
+1Quote:
Originally Posted by marksmannopQuote:
Originally Posted by Primosz
better idea is..something like a panel!..few trusted members...who decide the level of trackers..that woudl be way better
Very good idea. The 15-20 most trusted members should vote only, and decide the rating of a tracker. This way there will be no more noob votes, like in the nCore voting, when they rated it lvl6, but it's clearly higher level.
What's wrong with just saying. Fuck the rarity rating? and rating trackers according to what they are really worth?Quote:
+1
Very good idea. The 15-20 most trusted members should vote only, and decide the rating of a tracker. This way there will be no more noob votes, like in the nCore voting, when they rated it lvl6, but it's clearly higher level.
Speed/content/pre for general 0-day trackers and speed/content for special trackers like Norbits or SweDVDR that only have movies. Screw rarity and screw the so called awesome community trackers.
Quote:
Originally Posted by tupac+1Quote:
Originally Posted by marksman
Very good idea. The 15-20 most trusted members should vote only, and decide the rating of a tracker. This way there will be no more noob votes, like in the nCore voting, when they rated it lvl6, but it's clearly higher level.
i'm giving my vote to this idea also
Me too :naughty:Quote:
Originally Posted by KFlintQuote:
Originally Posted by tupac
i'm giving my vote to this idea also
+1Quote:
Originally Posted by 0110Me too :naughty:Quote:
Originally Posted by KFlint
i've seen more invites for ScT, SweDVDr and TT than FSC =\
don't think about swedvdr because it doesn't have invites atm:happy:Quote:
Originally Posted by maxehhh
TT also :)
Great info, thanx a lot :P
Quote:
Originally Posted by saulin
Im with you ;)
Then dont write here.Why do you care so much?
How come hdbits.org has content rating of 7, same as bit-hdtv and hdbits.ro? It should be 9 or even 10 - it's THE place for hd content with lots of exclusive stuff.
+1Quote:
Originally Posted by AugustoP
i think 10 for HDbits it's the best!Quote:
Originally Posted by AugustoP
If TL is only 9, then I don't think that hdbits.org deserves 10 :noes:Quote:
Originally Posted by GaleaNaturi think 10 for HDbits it's the best!Quote:
Originally Posted by AugustoP
Maybe TL should be 10, and hdbits 8 or 9 :whistling
TL = general 0-day site - Not the bestQuote:
Originally Posted by tupacIf TL is only 9, then I don't think that hdbits.org deserves 10 :noes:Quote:
Originally Posted by GaleaNatur
Maybe TL should be 10, and hdbits 8 or 9 :whistling
HDBits = HD only site - THE best HD site
Now you see why it should be 10?
TL = general 0-day site - The bestQuote:
Originally Posted by PoOkiTL = general 0-day site - Not the bestQuote:
Originally Posted by tupac
HDBits = HD only site - THE best HD site
Now you see why it should be 10?
HDBits = HD only site - THE best HD site? Maybe, I don't care. But it's just HD content, an unimportant category (the main categorys would be: 0day, DVDRs, TV shows, music, e-learning) . No matter how good a HD site is, I wouldn't rate it 10. So that you can understand, here is another example: no matter how good is a wrestling tracker (amazing pre-times, amazing speed, etc.), I wouldn't rate it 10, because it's a wrestling tracker. You just can't compare these with sites like TL,FTN,SCT,SweDVDR,BitmeTV,Bitme,Oink.
it doesn't matter what the site is about .Quote:
Originally Posted by tupacTL = general 0-day site - The bestQuote:
Originally Posted by PoOki
HDBits = HD only site - THE best HD site? Maybe, I don't care. But it's just HD content, an unimportant category (the main categorys would be: 0day, DVDRs, TV shows, music, e-learning) . No matter how good a HD site is, I wouldn't rate it 10. So that you can understand, here is another example: no matter how good is a wrestling tracker (amazing pre-times, amazing speed, etc.), I wouldn't rate it 10, because it's a wrestling tracker. You just can't compare these with sites like TL,FTN,SCT,SweDVDR,BitmeTV,Bitme,Oink.
like OINK is only music and alitlle bit of more things... but he still 9 [ no ? ]
its about the content in the tracker's area of torrents .
like trackers that dealing with TV SHOWS or Wrestling ... they only dealing with that, not 0day ... .
HDBits and any other highdef trackers are colored blue, which specifically means "dedicated tracker". Isn't that a clear indication that those trackers don't fit into any main categories and should therefore only be compared to each other? This rating isn't about public interest in highdef but about the quality this tracker displays.Quote:
Originally Posted by tupac
At the moment, the trackers with exclusively hd content are the following and their rating is wrong. One month ago I asked for a similar change in those ratings and those reasons are still true today. I don't care if HDBits.org gets a 10 or 9 or even 8, but I DO care about a distinction between the best of the best and some mediocre tracker.
HDBITS.ro Level 2 [7]
BiT-HDTV Level 2 [7]
HDBits Level 4 [7]
I know that the dedicated trackers are coloured in blue. But that doesen't change my opinion that: a wrestling or car-racing or HD tracker can't be ranked lvl10 content-wise. The best 0day tracker will be always better than the best HD tracker :whistling, because 0day content > HD content. And the ratings should reflect that.Quote:
Originally Posted by DanielHDBits and any other highdef trackers are colored blue, which specifically means "dedicated tracker". Isn't that a clear indication that those trackers don't fit into any main categories and should therefore only be compared to each other? This rating isn't about public interest in highdef but about the quality this tracker displays.Quote:
Originally Posted by tupac
At the moment, the trackers with exclusively hd content are the following and their rating is wrong. One month ago I asked for a similar change in those ratings and those reasons are still true today. I don't care if HDBits.org gets a 10 or 9 or even 8, but I DO care about a distinction between the best of the best and some mediocre tracker.
HDBITS.ro Level 2 [7]
BiT-HDTV Level 2 [7]
HDBits Level 4 [7]
totally agree...Quote:
Originally Posted by marksman