Isn't post #5001 suppose to be the last one this thread?Quote:
Originally Posted by chavis
Printable View
Isn't post #5001 suppose to be the last one this thread?Quote:
Originally Posted by chavis
:dunno:
Great to see you still can't make two posts in a row without editing one of them, Allen.
One would ostensibly edit to correct or less often, improve the post.
You're the only cunt on the internets who actually makes a post worse by editing it. Well done, you spastic.
:blink:
There are two reasons as to your confusion.Quote:
Originally Posted by emailk2
The first being that you've only been in the lounge for about 5 minutes and don't know that Allen, the twat with the alien avatar above, is an undisputed mongoloid.
The second being that you're clearly a mongoloid yourself and don't belong here and never will.
Hope I've cleared that up for you, though I doubt it due to the reasons I've mentioned above.
First seems more likely...
yup clarification was really helpful. I can clearly visualize about him now:
http://img204.imageshack.us/img204/103/mongoloid3.jpg
The fact that you cannot do an attachment properly is only adding to your mongtastic status. :turned:Quote:
Originally Posted by emailk2
I'm not hip on the exclusionary policy, where it'd seem you'd rather round up all the native Mongolians and pack them shoulder to shoulder in the bt trade chambers. The theory being that they continue exchanging various diatomic and triatomic gas-phase molecules until they've basically no choice but to trade O2 for N2 and CO2; up until they all basically suffocate. I'm pretty sure supporters of your battle with the "mongs" might find this a lucid strategy, but you'd end up robbing yourself of your own principles.Quote:
Originally Posted by chavis
There are no principles involved save for a love of language braided with creativity. There's no battle either. The astronomic majority alight like spastic birdies and presently flap off again. There will never be a shortage. Of this I'm certain.Quote:
Originally Posted by mjmackyI'm not hip on the exclusionary policy, where it'd seem you'd rather round up all the native Mongolians and pack them shoulder to shoulder in the bt trade chambers. The theory being that they continue exchanging various diatomic and triatomic gas-phase molecules until they've basically no choice but to trade O2 for N2 and CO2; up until they all basically suffocate. I'm pretty sure supporters of your battle with the "mongs" might find this a lucid strategy, but you'd end up robbing yourself of your own principles.Quote:
Originally Posted by chavis
How can I lose? Either they vanish in a bluster of inept insults of which I've read just about them all, or they step up their game and apply wit and reason, which works out tickety-boo all round. I'm able to be objective about the vituperation I receive, but I take it personally when stupid wankbrains don't even try.
Also, I honestly think I'm addicted to being a harsh cunt on the internets.
The principle, I assumed in your possession, of maintaining an environment where the only constraints our ones we've placed upon ourselves. A voicing of preference, in any degree of subtlety, would be fair game. However, a communal decree would seem beyond, if not beneath you.Quote:
Originally Posted by chavis
I only used "battle" as a repercussion of translation from German. I realize now the reference was not a valid comparison, since you didn't feign any appreciation for these types prior to your distaste. It was a linear trap I fell victim to while marching out the other end of a "gas" chamber. I fail to produce a more appropriate reference even now.
Not that I'm a fan of the movement but....
Quote:
Jay Z, Michael Moore cash in on Occupy
As it says on their “about” page…(Occupy Wall Street) is fighting back against the corrosive power of major banks and multinational corporations (and) aims to expose how the richest 1% of people are writing the rules of an unfair global economy.“Yeeaahh”, says Michael Moore, who addressed an Occupy crowd in Denver last week and railed against “greedy” corporations. Though, to be fair, that isn’t why he went to Denver in the first place.Moore was in Denver on a tour to promote his $27 memoir, ‘Here Comes Trouble: Stories from My Life.’By the way that book is published by Grand Central Publishing, a subdivision of the French company Hachette, which is the second largest publisher in the world. Hachette is a wholly owned subsidiary of the Lagardère Group, a multinational conglomerate headquartered in Paris which does business in nearly 40 countries. Among other things they hold a 7.5% stake in EADS, a global defense and military contractor, which absorbed the Lagardère subsidiary Aérospatiale-Matra, a French missile and aircraft manufacturer.Jay-Z ,the millionaire rapper and entrepreneur is launching a line of Occupy Wall Street-themed t-shirts featuring the phrase “Occupy All Streets,” that go on sale on Jay-Z’s Rocawear website on Friday.But the genius behind “99 Problems” isn’t sharing the profits with the 99 percent. A spokesperson from Rocawear told Business Insider in a statement that the company has not “made an official commitment” to support the movement financially.
Why the fuck should Jay-Z share his income with the 99%? He went from rags to riches, he earned it and shouldn't be entitled to give it away to dole blugers.
Btw, not a fan of Jay-Z as an artist.
I think the point trying to be made was that it's sort of incredibly cuntish to use a movement solely created to battle corporate greed to further pad one's pockets.
I also think regardless of Jay-Z's difficult beginnings that you have a very loose interpretation of "earned".
Well. That's exactly what people who earn money do. They give a portion of it to the unemployed.Quote:
Originally Posted by iLOVENZB
There's this new thing in the northern hemisphere called 'tax'. It seems to be catching on.
Btw, I might be away from the keyboard for quite some time. My eyes started bleeding when I read 'shouldn't be entitled to give it away'.
On another note, what is a bluger ? :bag:Quote:
Originally Posted by mankerWell. That's exactly what people who earn money do. They give a portion of it to the unemployed.Quote:
Originally Posted by iLOVENZB
There's this new thing in the northern hemisphere called 'tax'. It seems to be catching on.
Btw, I might be away from the keyboard for quite some time. My eyes started bleeding when I read 'shouldn't be entitled to give it away'.
Should be a d in there somewhere.Quote:
Originally Posted by ArtemisOn another note, what is a bluger ? :bag:Quote:
Originally Posted by manker
Ahh yes the tax, which usually ends up in welfare anyway. Not sure what the welfare system is like where you are but it's a fucking joke here.Quote:
Originally Posted by mankerWell. That's exactly what people who earn money do. They give a portion of it to the unemployed.Quote:
Originally Posted by iLOVENZB
There's this new thing in the northern hemisphere called 'tax'. It seems to be catching on.
Btw, I might be away from the keyboard for quite some time. My eyes started bleeding when I read 'shouldn't be entitled to give it away'.
It seems to work okay here. In fact, it works so well that hundreds of thousands of people have realised that they're better off giving up their jobs and being unemployed.Quote:
Originally Posted by iLOVENZBAhh yes the tax, which usually ends up in welfare anyway. Not sure what the welfare system is like where you are but it's a fucking joke here.Quote:
Originally Posted by manker
Many people on welfare are "earning" more than I do right now. I could almost go all in if it weren't for the fact that it's not really sustainable to suit my personal interests.Quote:
Originally Posted by manker
Sssshhhhh. Next thing you know, someone will go exploiting Woodstock. :yikes:Quote:
Originally Posted by IdolEyes787
On a more serious note, I did find it interesting that M. Moore is connected to such large corporate interests, but then (roughly 3 seconds later) I realized that it is a necessary evil when one wants to get their message distributed to "the masses". I don't have a problem with him (or anyone else) making money, nor do I take issue with distribution channels being connected to large corporations. That is, as long as the desired messages are not edited, nor censored by such distributors.
If Moore had chosen to keep his films "grass roots" no one would have ever heard of him. I find his films at least worthy of consideration. If he has "sold out" then his new films will contain substantially different story lines.
Jay-Z is a bit different, IMO. However, this could be from the fact that he is nothing more than a recognizable name to me. I cannot name one of his songs, and have no idea if he has ever expressed similar "anti-corporate greed" messages in his music. His quick efforts to grab some t-shirt cash seem odorous in such an environment, though. However Robinhood-like he may be, I am certain his record company/distributors are equally connected to Big Business, too.
Is it possible for anyone (pure intentions assumed) to get their message out without relying on corporate interests at some point in their careers? Is it possible for anyone to stay "pure"? Is it wrong for these individuals to make money while expressing their uncensored views?
Does Bruce Wayne count?
And then we have the comic icon, Frank Miller:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/blog...?newsfeed=trueQuote:
He writes: "Occupy" is nothing short of a clumsy, poorly-expressed attempt at anarchy, to the extent that the "movement" – HAH! Some "movement", except if the word "bowel" is attached - is anything more than an ugly fashion statement by a bunch of iPhone, iPad wielding spoiled brats who should stop getting in the way of working people and find jobs for themselves" it reads.
Skimming his statements, I had no idea Frank Miller was an internet brat.Quote:
Originally Posted by iLOVENZB
Attachment 92307I almost agree with him. I think it was on Forbes where they had a diagram of a Wall Street rally. Basically they were showing off the protesters accessories that were produced by corporate businesses.
It's like "The Greens" party here in Australia, they're bitching about "dirty" fuel entering the atmosphere but rock up in a black Ford's to meetings.
edit: Guess it wasn't:
http://i.imgur.com/brPxe.jpg
The fact that these protesters are rallying against corporate greed and domination does not necessarily make them hypocrites (although some undoubtedly are) simply because corporations touch every aspect of their lives. It is in fact due to these corporations having their hands in EVERYTHING that drives them (some, anyway) to protest.Quote:
Originally Posted by iLOVENZB
Allowing the banking industry (Wall Street) to get away with hundreds of billions of dollars without so much as public outrage would be a FAR greater crime than wanna-be hippies standing around while consuming corporate-created products. Frank Miller calling these people "anarchists" of sorts is missing the point. Entirely. Protest without violence is quite democratic. Perhaps the next time Wall Street walks away with billions of public money, the protestors won't be so quiet...
I agree that the banking industry in Wall Street needs a good kick in the bullocks, but that doesn't mean that it's acceptable for protesters start looking beyond the picture and target all large corporations as 'evil'.
I think I understand now why people disliked the Jews back in the 30's.
Recent head injury, perhaps, NZB? :unsure:Quote:
Originally Posted by iLOVENZB
No, his rather rabid ultra-right wing views align perfectly with National Socialist doctrine.Quote:
Originally Posted by megabytemeRecent head injury, perhaps, NZB? :unsure:Quote:
Originally Posted by iLOVENZB
So, most likely, an early childhood injury involving a bicycle, a brick wall, and a forgotten helmet.Quote:
Originally Posted by Artemis
I myself am the product of that, adding a hill and remember the helmet. A freaking miracle that I wore it given that it was atrocious looking, probably wore it a total of 3 times.Quote:
Originally Posted by megabytemeSo, most likely, an early childhood injury involving a bicycle, a brick wall, and a forgotten helmet.Quote:
Originally Posted by Artemis
Obviously, you were a better rider without it. :yup:
Or rather I make better decisions without a safety net, that's probably true for all of us.Quote:
Originally Posted by megabyteme
Either that, or your brain is wind-turbine powered. :D
salutaions, nigras.
I've got an appointment in 20 mins with a new milfy beautician client.
currently wearing a navy cardigan edged with grey and a crisp white shirt underneath. she won't be able to resist :smilie4:
editedQuote:
Originally Posted by manker
Whoa, whoa, whoa, angry gav.Quote:
Originally Posted by anigaveditedQuote:
Originally Posted by manker
I don't know how they do things in your native Greek homeland.
But I've just met the woman - and I'm not even into pegging, like.
20 minutes over?
Jebus, the spasticity is strong with this one :dabs:
two hours ago, I made a post which said that in 20 mins I had an appointment.
so, yes, unsurprisingly twenty minutes has in fact elapsed during the interim two hours.