I have used both for sometime (along with a couple others) and have settled on utorrent. Its just more efficient and lightweight for me.
Printable View
I have used both for sometime (along with a couple others) and have settled on utorrent. Its just more efficient and lightweight for me.
I currently use Azurues but I am considering uTorrent. I switched from Limewire to Bearshare today so I am open for a change lol
utorrent is the best it can be work on the 1980 s pc also.
u torrent less resource consumption
but i prefer Azures have cool plug-ins
-------
if you use it in unix or linux it will consume less resource
we all know windows--hhhh
uTorrent - less resources and it's just as good (or better) at what bitcomet and azureus were designed to do, and that is downloading and seeding.
Utorrent, definetely
Just like asking Norton vs Nod32
1 is a memory hog which uses up all resources resulting in slow pc and a pig to get off your HD.
The other is a quick,effective scanner light on resources and very user friendly.
Azureus has a nice interface, but it does waste resources.
utorrent runs smoother, I prefer using less resources and give up some of the trendy looks
I prefer Utorrent rather than Azureus but I think BitComet pwn both X_x