Quote:
Originally Posted by Rat Faced
Thanks for that, however just a wee correction. The RK is not always the owner, tho' it usually is. I am RK for both of our cars, but my wife owns one.
Printable View
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rat Faced
Thanks for that, however just a wee correction. The RK is not always the owner, tho' it usually is. I am RK for both of our cars, but my wife owns one.
That's exactly what's gonna happen here....Quote:
Originally Posted by JPaul
All families removed from Gaza Strip will receive some 300,000 Shekels (which is about 37,500 Pounds...
The government has also started building houses for these people in a city down south... But, these nutters don't know when to stop and take what is offered, and this is what is pissing everyone in Israel off.......
That's one way to look at it, but I've also thought about another thing, even mentioned it, but it got lost in one of billy's rants:Quote:
Originally Posted by Busyman
If we are going to look at it on a national level, couldn't, say, Jordan make a claim for it, as there was no Palestine when a lot of it was taken, and some of it used to be jordani soil, I think? I'm thinking that's one way to interpret the resolution, but I'm not sure.
Just wondering, really :unsure:
Of course, there's one thing everyone has overlooked.
Let's suppose that 1967 is far enough back that Israel and its settlers have a legal right to keep everything. So when are the Jews going to repay all the billions back to Germany? It was more than another 20 years back, so by the same principal Germany has a right to keep the money they stole.
I don't believe that's right, but maybe someone who thinks that the settlers have a valid claim would like to back up their argument with this in mind.
That's a good point, bit hard to compare to the settlements tho', at least for me.Quote:
Originally Posted by lynx
For one thing, it's Germany as a nation that was paying, right?
And money is just money, there's not a person in the world that gets attached to a specific bill, so any money will do, as long as it is money.
On the other hand, each settled piece of land is in a specific location and can't be replaced with another item, so someone, an individual, not a nation, is going to end up losing that piece of land.
I suppose, if looked at the same way as money, ie an asset, it can be replaced with money, or a substitute, tho'.
If the settler is a proven thief tho', I'm all for not giving him or her anything for it, it's only the innocent ones who'd be able to make any claim on the property IMO, whether this is 'cos they acquired it in good faith, or becuse they inherited it.
l was talking about the article, as you know full well. You really are scraping the bottom of the barrel now. :lol:Quote:
Originally Posted by lynx
How do l check posts you've deleted? In one thread, (l'll find it when l get back from work), you deleted posts that were critical of you, after the poster complained, you put them back again, a good bit of moderating there don't you think?Quote:
As for deleting posts, I have only ever deleted posts which were generally offensive in nature or against the rules. Prove me wrong. I challenge you. Prove me wrong. Or retract the statement and STFU
And just exacly how would anyone know that? Was there a big sign saying "look, ignore the fact that I'm quoting a Palestinian web page, I'm referring to the pages from a different Israeli site". If you had wanted to quote the Israeli site, you could have simply done so, it wasn't hard when I looked into it a bit deeper. So why didn't you, you knew what the site was all the time. But by quoting a single page buried in the arab2 site, the result was that the links were hidden making it harder to find the original posting and to navigate to the index, which is exactly what you wanted to achieve.Quote:
Originally Posted by RioDeLeo
How do you check deleted posts? A good question. But of course that begs the question how do you know I've deleted any? You don't, so once again you are caught quoting things you can't prove. Except this time google isn't going to come to your aid.Quote:
Originally Posted by RioDeLeo
Of course, you refer to a single post that I deleted. Except that when I deleted it I posted that I had deleted it because I found it offensive, and PMed the poster that I had done it. And after complaints I restored it to show why I thought it offensive.
But all this raises an interesting point. In order to find out about that means you've been looking in here for quite a long time, since you haven't had time to read all the posts in here, unless you are some sort of superman... The very suggestion makes me laugh.
Maybe you read the references to that thread on your own site, Billy, we know you talked about it. Or would you prefer to be called Rikk? I think we can now categorically say that you are exposed.
But have you proof lynx, proof. Remember this is an interweb chat forum, so the level of proof must be of the highest standard.
No wait, it doesn't really, does it.
Right, hands up anyone who thinks this is not a fomer, banned member of the antipodean variety, of which we speak.
Sit down Billy.
This really is getting boring, being stalked by a moderator should be a hanging offence, for the moderator that is.Quote:
Originally Posted by lynx
Do you stalk people outside the internet, or is it just a web thing?Quote:
Originally Posted by JPaul
you're still around?
i thought i'd missed you when i was banned.
how is it possible that i get banned because of an impossible conspiracy theory, but even though BD is circumventing a ban and practically admits it, he gets to stay?
Reading (or, to be more accurate, understanding what you've read) just isn't your thing, is it. I didn't claim not to have deleted that post, I said I hadn't deleted any posts that weren't offensive or against the board rules. That fact still applies, so there is no way that my two statements cancel each other out.
Not calling you all these other members, Billy, only one. And if you are banned it will be a Team decision, not an individual one, we don't work like that here, unlike your board. And we don't have special little sections where we gossip about what's going on on other boards either.Quote:
You people insisting l am all these other members must be really hard up for something to talk about. If you believe l'm someone who shouldn't be here then ban me, which is what l suspect this is all about anyway, an excuse to get rid of someone who stands up to you
You stand up to me? That's a laugh, you are the only one here who has deliberately gone out of their way to insult and disparage anyone who has presented a view opposed to yours.
If you are bored, why not just piss off back to your own little hovel and moan to your friends in your secret FST section.
And we are all stalking you, I hope you realise that Rafi only started this thread to entice you in.
Duno, but it's pretty funny :PQuote:
Originally Posted by GepperRankins
btw i don't want BD banned. he's fun
Same here :schnauz:Quote:
Originally Posted by GepperRankins
http://moderation.invisionzone.com/s...fault/Rikk.gif
:lol:Quote:
Originally Posted by RioDeLeo
No, I really just don't like anti-semitic people. Who return to places they are not wanted, to stir up trouble. It's really rather pathetic. Don't you even see that.
Either you post for effect and reaction, or you post because it's what you believe and how you behave. Either way you're a pathetic sad wee man.
Other people want you to stay, to laugh at you, which is fair enough. I think you are a sleazy, hate-filled individual and would rather you went where you were wanted. Tho' having seen you post on other forums that seldom lasts long.
Your whole lifetimes experience must show that you are a nasty, unwanted piece of work. Have you become so bitter and twisted that it's all you have left. Like a spoilt child, any attention is better than none at all.
But that's just my opinion. So what next, your predictable reactions are normally;
1. Call me J'Prick
2. Say "I must have got to you"
3. Say "Are you infatuated with me"
4. Try to rile me by having a pop at Catholicism
5. Set up a sub-section on your board, in my name (the most pathetic I think).
You're kidding!Quote:
Originally Posted by J'Prick
I think that's the funniest yet http://www.sighost.us/members/danb/glag.gif
I wanted manker's world of smack at his forum - but I don't think I've got to him enough.
wanker's world of smack, I think you'll find.:naughty:Quote:
Originally Posted by manker
No, I think he'll hunt you down like the wretched cur you are and give you a damn good hiding.
Have I done enough to get a special mention, do you think?
I've been trying (very :naughty: ).
Unfortunately they aren't allowed to discuss us in public. Otherwise they have to go into the diary room and probably get evicted. I wonder what his pet name for me will be.
stynx?
i'm thinking you're gonna have to pwn him more to get him to hate you. i suspect he's only had eyes for JPaul in this thread, billy's always had a thing for him
:dry:
You think he'll snap my arm as if it were a twig, like wot he dun to haxor :ohmy:Quote:
Originally Posted by JPaul
I mean, he did say that he was going to travel half way across the world to give him what's coming to him. I paraphrase but can't believe it would be an idle threat.
Is this thread lounge-bound yet, btw?
Haxor hasn't been posting for ages, anywhere I've been :unsure:
Just been chatting with RPerry on MSN, he's just going to bed.
Means he'll be up and at work at about the same time as RioDeLeo posts on here.
Nah, couldn't be. :shifty:
You know me too well. :cry:Quote:
Originally Posted by GepperRankins
Makes a change, i thought it was me he hated :P
You're his chum.Quote:
Originally Posted by Rat Faced
Either that or he's interweb grooming you.
I wish he'd come to America. :shifty:Quote:
Originally Posted by manker
Aye looks that way... well, it was a good discussion whilst on-topic... Any idea how we can drastically send it back on track..? :unsure:Quote:
Originally Posted by SnnY
To be honest, I think we've reached the end of the line.. ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by tralalala
oh yeah. on-topic. i'd have no problem with going to isreal on holiday. if i was going to the middle-east on holiday i'd rather go to somewhere that looks less like europe or america though
Rafi,
I could say something like.
I am sure Israel has much to offer, however whilst I still percieve it as being dangerous for my family and I to visit I will choose to visit other places. There are plenty places to see where I would be more able to relax and enjoy the culture.
I could add that you may be perfectly comfortable with the current situation. However most other people aren't used to the overt security which you obviously need. That it acts as a constant reminder of the troubles in your region.
I could end by suggesting that a cessation of hostilities is in everyone's interests. The tourist money alone should encourage you (both) to compromise. To say nothing of your quality of life.
Compromise mate, it's the only way.
I'll probably never go to Israel.
I want to go somewhere to have fun, get pissy drunk and relax in the sun.
Maybe I'll hit Mexico. Puerto Vallarta, Casamel, Acupulco, Cancoun........
.............shit I could never go to Israel. :lol: :lol: :lol:
Not being of any of the three religions that are interested, there is little Israel has to offer me, that i cant get cheaper and better elswhere.
There are places in the Middle East I would be interested in visiting sometime such as Egypt... but that'll have to wait upon my Lottery Win.
As i said earlier, its not the fear of "terrorist attack", as i imagine that your more likely to get hit by a drunk driver even in Israel. However the armed guards all over the place would put me off.
For me, it ain't the guards or une terroristes, it's the WTF DO THEY GOTS? factor.Quote:
Originally Posted by Rat Faced
Phillistine.Quote:
Originally Posted by Busyman
you mean palastine? :pinch:Quote:
Originally Posted by JPaul
I so don't, on so many levels.Quote:
Originally Posted by GepperRankins
I thought you only had 2 levels..
The academic and the gutter :P
Hoi, that's so many, to me. :blink:Quote:
Originally Posted by Rat Faced