Move E**** to level 10 (I can't believe I just said that), there are no more invites there.
11-28-2007, 12:39 AM
valhala
Re: WIAW: Invite System Style
good job man :yes: I like ur thread but it need a hard work to Examines all the tracker :rolleyes:.
11-28-2007, 01:01 AM
Papps78
Re: WIAW: Invite System Style
What does the red + mean?
11-28-2007, 03:41 AM
Kyl3KK
Re: WIAW: Invite System Style
Rarer than the level its at but not enough to be in the next level...
its like a .5
11-28-2007, 08:30 AM
SAM
Re: WIAW: Invite System Style
great effort and very nice guide for nontraders
thx mate for your good work
11-28-2007, 11:57 PM
Kyl3KK
Re: WIAW: Invite System Style
hey SAM is back!
12-06-2007, 02:56 AM
Grind$oFine
Re: WIAW: Invite System Style
How to set this up is very limited since its a forum, and there's not a lot of options for coding however, I was playing with some tags and I got an idea.
What if things were set up like this?:
They could either be in alphabetical order, or in order of invite rarity. Depends on... if anyone likes this, and which would be preferred if you'd like to see this. It would also show the true invite rarity and how the rarity gets effected by demand.
I think this set up would definitely set it apart from the WTAW, and also put more stress on the information in this thread and not the level.
So what do people think?
12-06-2007, 03:02 AM
tiolewis
Re: WIAW: Invite System Style
The only thing i want to say is: "This thread is awesome"
12-06-2007, 03:11 AM
supper
Re: WIAW: Invite System Style
nice work Grind$oFine and very good activity from u this rank is relly looks awesome but iam not agree with u of demand rank of FTN and sct u reating ftn very high and sct very high too i dont think ppl here need sct as the same level of demand of ftn u just simply can fine some one tradeing sct for ftn or ftn for sct
all i want to say demand of ftn is very high and demand of sct just high
12-06-2007, 03:13 AM
Grind$oFine
Re: WIAW: Invite System Style
Quote:
Originally Posted by supper
nice work Grind$oFine and very good activity from u but iam not agree with u of demand rank of FTN and sct u reating ftn very high and sct very high too i dont think ppl here need sct as the same level of demand of ftn u just simply can fine some one tradeing sct for ftn or ftn for sct
all i want to say demand of ftn is very high and demand of sct just high
That's the thing, this isn't based on trading equality at all, it's based on difficulty of a member obtaining invites, and ultimately the difficulty of someone getting an invite for free.