sex offenders lists

Double-post.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by FKDUP74

it's a simple difference of opinion.....bitch

---

That was my point. You had the gall to say that my opinion on an internet forum puts children in danger. You can't answer the question I posed as to why my opinion can put children in danger can you? Though more likely you didn't read my post fully before you started your little "flame fest"*.

But I can I see how your mind works, though I'm loath to give you a label because I can see you're a army of one in your idiocy.

Someone disagrees with you then in your eyes they want to harm children or don't care if they do get harmed. They disagree some more, you all but wish harm on any children they might have.

I hope you're kids have a smart mother, because their future is bleak if they think/act like you.

Oh, and for fuck's sake. I am not a 'liberal' get that through your thick head. (Can't deny the 'fucking' part though).


*I'm implying you're not very good at it.**

**The flaming, I'm implying you're not very good at the flaming.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MCHeshPants420

Someone disagrees with you then in your eyes they want to harm children

---

I agree completely. It is a silly stance to take. :(

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by bigboab

I agree completely. It is a silly stance to take. :(

---

Well I can at least thank FKDUP74 for waking my brain up this morning (I'm not a morning person in a very literal sense) as I have an essay to finish for 3pm...just 300 words and a spell-check to go. :D

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MCHeshPants420

Well I can at least thank Brian for waking my brain up this morning (I'm not a morning person in a very literal sense) as I have an essay to finish for 3pm...just 300 words and a spell-check to go. :D

---

who's Brian?

Tell me later. Get on with your essay. :)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by bigboab

who's Brian?

Tell me later. Get on with your essay. :)

---

FKDUP74 apparently. I can see how bad that looks now. :lol:

Just remembered I have to vote as well. I'll probably vote Lib Dem, eh? :shifty:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MCHeshPants420

FKDUP74 apparently. I can see how bad that looks now. :lol:

Just remembered I have to vote as well. I'll probably vote Lib Dem, eh? :shifty:

---

I was hoping for a Monster Raving Loony Party Candidate. I think Liberal will be my choice too. :)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by FKDUP74

OK bitch.....you wanna start a fucking flame fest?

if you can't handle a little criticism, hopefully you're not a parent,
because you sure as hell couldn't handle kids if so

and if you are now, or ever become a father....
don't fucking blame ANYONE if your child gets abused
because you wanna stay ignorant to your neighbors/surroundings/whatever
you risk your children, I will do what it takes to protect mine
it's a simple difference of opinion.....bitch

but it's ok, I know now how you fucking liberals really think :)

---

I have a son, he turned one last month. Lovely little chap.

It's funny how you say that having children changed your perspective, does this mean that the birth changed you from a fucking liberal into your current state. Shame.

Anyway, I will protect my son in a variety of ways, one of them being him having no time alone with strangers. I think that's sensible. What I'll also be aware of tho' is that children who are abused normally get abused by people in positions of trust rather than someone who you just don't know. A first time offender. I am presuming that a convicted sex offender cannot ascend to a position of trust involving kids where you live too and that convicted paedophiles have special release circumstances which preclude them from being near children - this kinda negates Nikki's, well written but ultimately flawed, post.

We're both running the same risk here, I mean knowing that the guy at #34 is a sex offender and not letting him be alone with your child is a good thing but does it mean that you'll leave your child be alone with the guy at #33 who isn't on the list. Of course not and neither will I.

To safeguard 100% against paedophiles who've not yet been caught would entail locking the kid up under either your or your partner's supervision 24/7. I'm not going to do that but I will be extra vigilant when it comes to the time when either myself or a member of my immediate family cannot be by his side.

I would expect every parent to do the same.



A paedophile list would not make my child any safer because I take full responsibility for that task. I'm confident that I can do it with or without a public sex-offender list.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Mchesh

How is me disagreeing with someone's fucking opinion risking innocent children? You can ignore the rest of my points and answer that. Idiot.

---

What's with the name calling?

Those opposed to the list are fine with not knowing who may be a sex offender in their area. It seems they will treat everyone with the same scrutiny or not. These folks may be invited into their homes but not necessary left with their children.

Those for it will know who has been convicted of a sex offense beforehand. I doubt they would be invited anywhere.

You may scrutinize folks but you may start to trust someone after you get to know them yet they are a sex offender.

Over in the US we are better informed.

You choose not to know 'cause someone might hurt them.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Busyman

What's with the name calling?

---

:lol:

You rodding or what :D