Re: What Trackers Are Worth [With Reviews and Ratings]
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ahcorac72
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Not Complete
In the future will know many reasons :rolleyes:
Maybe :P
Maybe Not :P This is life
Quote:
Originally Posted by
F.B.I
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Not Complete
Why ?
plz i need some info about this and why must be level 10 :)
Because they have l33t members :rolleyes:
133 or 33 members
Re: What Trackers Are Worth [With Reviews and Ratings]
TTC is the new FST uber1337 secret tracker that's going to have short lifespan.
Re: What Trackers Are Worth [With Reviews and Ratings]
hdbits.org up 1 level. invites taken away from all except vip?/staff/uploaders
Re: What Trackers Are Worth [With Reviews and Ratings]
where are bitmetv and elektronic?
edit: they are level 3? WHY?
Re: What Trackers Are Worth [With Reviews and Ratings]
Quote:
Originally Posted by
eden297
where are bitmetv and elektronic?
edit: they are level 3? WHY?
BitmeTV was open for signup and Electronic gave every user 15 invites!
Re: What Trackers Are Worth [With Reviews and Ratings]
I think its time for Desitorrents to get some promotion, Desi content wise its doing damn good and haven't opened invites for years.But its available for buying i guess .
:D
Re: What Trackers Are Worth [With Reviews and Ratings]
After consultation with the staff here and discussion with members of TTC we do trust, we have decide to move it up
it's obviously a one of a kind tracker...since its creation invites were always only handed out by staff and the candidates must be very well-known in the warez community to have a chance to get in
plus there is the omerta or code of silence surrounding it, not many members will take the chance to talk about it in a public forum, the userbase is rather small and leaks are easy to find
so it's probably next to impossible to get in by trading, just like uk-t, but it's still deserves to be include in the list in our opinion as we don't want to hide information to FST members ;)
Re: What Trackers Are Worth [With Reviews and Ratings]
Quote:
Originally Posted by
KFlint
After consultation with the staff here and discussion with members of TTC we do trust, we have decide to move it up
it's obviously a one of a kind tracker...since its creation invites were always only handed out by staff and the candidates must be very well-known in the warez community to have a chance to get in
plus there is the omerta or code of silence surrounding it, not many members will take the chance to talk about it in a public forum, the userbase is rather small and leaks are easy to find
so it's probably next to impossible to get in by trading, just like uk-t, but it's still deserves to be include in the list in our opinion as we don't want to hide information to FST members ;)
What's the point of it all? Is that because you want to have some kind of fun and see how people react, or is there some other motive I don't understand?
Re: What Trackers Are Worth [With Reviews and Ratings]
What.Cd should be lvl 10 for quality.
Cant beat it there :0
Re: What Trackers Are Worth [With Reviews and Ratings]
Quote:
Originally Posted by
KFlint
After consultation with the staff here and discussion with members of TTC we do trust, we have decide to move it up
it's obviously a one of a kind tracker...since its creation invites were always only handed out by staff and the candidates must be very well-known in the warez community to have a chance to get in
plus there is the omerta or code of silence surrounding it, not many members will take the chance to talk about it in a public forum, the userbase is rather small and leaks are easy to find
so it's probably next to impossible to get in by trading, just like uk-t, but it's still deserves to be include in the list in our opinion as we don't want to hide information to FST members ;)
I guess this proves what people have been thinking.. This site is just a joke, otherwise it wouldn't reach level 10 in such a short time. (not that i give a **** about the levels, but considering what people managing this list have said before).