Re: Which OSX BT client do you prefer (and why)...
Quote:
Originally Posted by
madbeer
I have heard this before, but never really looked. I just checked, and its not really that bad. I was actively seeding 3 torrents and downloading one other when I took the attached screenshot. Granted, transmission (which isnt pictured) was using about 3x less memory than Azureus, but compared to FF and Safari its not all that bad.
First off, download FF3 :P Not only does it look sexy on OSX now, it's much better at memory management.
Secondly, it gets a lot worse once you're seeding/leeching a bunch of torrents at once (like seeding 30+).
Re: Which OSX BT client do you prefer (and why)...
hehe ill pick up ff3 after boozing for cinco de mayo (thanks for the tip) ...
Why does everyone have a hard on for µTorrent? I mean the whole appeal I thought was because it was so lightweight, but going through the hassle (and overhead) of installing 'crossover' or a fucking VM just boggles my mind. Is there some /dicksuck feature I overlooked :naughty:?
Re: Which OSX BT client do you prefer (and why)...
Quote:
Originally Posted by
madbeer
hehe ill pick up ff3 after boozing for cinco de mayo (thanks for the tip) ...
Why does everyone have a hard on for µTorrent? I mean the whole appeal I thought was because it was so lightweight, but going through the hassle (and overhead) of installing 'crossover' or a fucking VM just boggles my mind. Is there some /dicksuck feature I overlooked :naughty:?
ever use crossover?
no overhead whatsoever on my machine.
Re: Which OSX BT client do you prefer (and why)...
Azureus cos it have many options and it is not buggy and also all trackers is allowing azureus :)