Re: Should two consenting adults be free...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Barbarossa
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sara
On topic....
I believe that anything goes providing that it is consensual of all parties.
The
Spanner case is an example of when the law gets involved in deciding what adults are and are not allowed to do to each other.
(A little extreme but again consensual so who's business is it other than those involved?)
I just had to read this is great depth because I've never heard of it and wondered what they were doing with their spanners... :blushing:
Now you know :lol:
Re: Should two consenting adults be free...
Re: Should two consenting adults be free...
I almost forgot to vote in my own poll; I am amending that oversight now.
Keep posting, people-there is another shoe, which I will drop soon enough.
Re: Should two consenting adults be free...
Quote:
Originally Posted by j2k4
I almost forgot to vote in my own poll; I am amending that oversight now.
Keep posting, people-there is another shoe, which I will drop soon enough.
I speak for us all when I say........NO SHIT. :lol: :lol: :lol:
1. I just received new info on something everyone is cool with.
2. I will post a poll for it and purposely hold off my obvious vote.
3. Allow the yes votes to mount up.
4. I then vote and allow more votes to mount up.
5. Then I let them have it. I got them all. :naughty: The voted Yes and with my new post of information....they realize they are wrong.
:dry:
Bring up adultery why don't you CaptainObvious. :ermm:
Marriage law....military law.....
Re: Should two consenting adults be free...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Busyman
Quote:
Originally Posted by j2k4
I almost forgot to vote in my own poll; I am amending that oversight now.
Keep posting, people-there is another shoe, which I will drop soon enough.
I speak for us all when I say........NO SHIT. :lol: :lol: :lol:
1. I just received new info on something everyone is cool with.
2. I will post a poll for it and purposely hold off my obvious vote.
3. Allow the yes votes to mount up.
4. I then vote and allow more votes to mount up.
5. Then I let them have it. I got them all. :naughty: The voted Yes and with my new post of information....they realize they are wrong.
:dry:
Bring up adultery why don't you CaptainObvious. :ermm:
Marriage law....military law.....
Nah.
But I did just read about a case of incest that "Lawrence...", as written, protects.
The offenders seem to be fine candidates for a "Get Out of Jail Free" card, and would presumably resume their prior intimacy.
They are brother and sister, born to the same set of biological parents.
Neat, huh?
Re: Should two consenting adults be free...
Quote:
Originally Posted by j2k4
Quote:
Originally Posted by Busyman
I speak for us all when I say........NO SHIT. :lol: :lol: :lol:
1. I just received new info on something everyone is cool with.
2. I will post a poll for it and purposely hold off my obvious vote.
3. Allow the yes votes to mount up.
4. I then vote and allow more votes to mount up.
5. Then I let them have it. I got them all. :naughty: The voted Yes and with my new post of information....they realize they are wrong.
:dry:
Bring up adultery why don't you CaptainObvious. :ermm:
Marriage law....military law.....
Nah.
But I did just read about a case of incest that
"Lawrence...", as written, protects.
The offenders seem to be fine candidates for a "Get Out of Jail Free" card, and would presumably resume their prior intimacy.
They are brother and sister, born to the same set of biological parents.
Neat, huh?
Hmmm...incest. I disagree.
Marriage law was a better fit.
If a dude wants to fuck around on his wife, she would have no grounds for divorce or anything.
It also would trample on Mormon's rights. :lol: :lol: :lol:
Not a slam dunk j2. Not a slam dunk.
Re: Should two consenting adults be free...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Busyman
Quote:
Originally Posted by j2k4
Nah.
But I did just read about a case of incest that "Lawrence...", as written, protects.
The offenders seem to be fine candidates for a "Get Out of Jail Free" card, and would presumably resume their prior intimacy.
They are brother and sister, born to the same set of biological parents.
Neat, huh?
Hmmm...incest. I disagree.
Marriage law was a better fit.
If a dude wants to fuck around on his wife, she would have no grounds for divorce or anything.
It also would trample on Mormon's rights. :lol: :lol: :lol:
Not a slam dunk j2. Not a slam dunk.
So, you're okay with incest?
Lawrence v. Texas makes no appropriate distinction; indeed, it makes none at all...
I don't take your hoops analogy. :huh:
Re: Should two consenting adults be free...
Quote:
Originally Posted by j2k4
Quote:
Originally Posted by Busyman
Hmmm...incest. I disagree.
Marriage law was a better fit.
If a dude wants to fuck around on his wife, she would have no grounds for divorce or anything.
It also would trample on Mormon's rights. :lol: :lol: :lol:
Not a slam dunk j2. Not a slam dunk.
So, you're okay with incest?
Lawrence v. Texas makes no appropriate distinction; indeed, it makes none at all...
I don't take your hoops analogy. :huh:
Incest between two consenting adult should not be illegal.
Why do you deem it such? 'Cause of the possibility of birth defects in a child born of the two? That is the only compelling reason I could think of.
What if I had a threesome with 2 sisters and they licked each other. Is that illegal?
Re: Should two consenting adults be free...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Busyman
Quote:
Originally Posted by j2k4
So, you're okay with incest?
Lawrence v. Texas makes no appropriate distinction; indeed, it makes none at all...
I don't take your hoops analogy. :huh:
Incest between two consenting adult should not be illegal.
Why do
you deem it such? 'Cause of the possibility of birth defects in a child born of the two? That is the only compelling reason I could think of.
What if I had a threesome with 2 sisters and they licked each other. Is that illegal?
If one of these sisters had a dick?
You bet. :dry:
Re: Should two consenting adults be free...
Quote:
Originally Posted by j2k4
Quote:
Originally Posted by Busyman
Incest between two consenting adult should not be illegal.
Why do you deem it such? 'Cause of the possibility of birth defects in a child born of the two? That is the only compelling reason I could think of.
What if I had a threesome with 2 sisters and they licked each other. Is that illegal?
If one of these sisters had a dick?
You bet. :dry:
:sick:
No really.
