I think posting an actual picture would actually be worse...Quote:
Originally Posted by bashnu
Printable View
I think posting an actual picture would actually be worse...Quote:
Originally Posted by bashnu
innocence is fragile
yeaQuote:
Originally Posted by rossco
all of the pics on the site are 12-17 YO in provocative poses. not necessary nudes or against the rules, but just fucked up on the parents for letting them do this shit
thats the point of this thread
because the parents have to sign all kinds of forms and waivers, its not like this is from Germany or the Netherlands where the law's are laxed on this "type" of shit.
well i personally wouldn't let my kids do this sort of thing, but if it's legal in florida, and all people are consenting adults, i don't think it's something that could be stopped to be honest.
i think the only thing we can be thankful of, is that these girls aren't being led to the backroom of a house with all the curtains closed and god knows what being done there.
i still don't spprove though :(
Quote:
Originally Posted by muchspl3
under 16 is wrong, but in britain at least, the age of consent is 16, and girls can be photographed topless at 16 also.
say hello to the future strippers/heroin addicts/prostitutes
:cry:Quote:
Originally Posted by Proper Bo
well ok then.......
what?Quote:
Originally Posted by muchspl3
Isn't the legal age in Scotland like 7?Quote:
Originally Posted by Proper Bo