Methinks this is a part of his "hat-stand defence" strategy.
Printable View
Methinks this is a part of his "hat-stand defence" strategy.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Busyman
So what should be entertained about peoples beliefs?.
We don't accept the defence "God told me to do it" when someone does something bad yet we accept "God told me to do it" without question if someone does an act of good. Are people that suggest they are doing "Gods will" all idiots or just some?
I am raising this as debate. Obviously as an atheist I think this guy is a weirdo but certainly an entertaining one
nah, this guy is an athiest too.
as we can see, theists don't question god.
Vid, I would have to see this 'Baptismal Contract' he speaks of to see if it would hold up in court.
Am feeling pretty ripped off right now. :P All I have is a little 'Certificate of Baptism'.
He must have misunderstood the term 'The Lord Helps Those Who Help Themselves.' I don't think that means taking things that are not yours to take.
On the otherhand, the man tends to pull only that from his religion that suits his needs at the time. That, in itself, isn't that rare, is it.
The point is that none of that matters. He broke the law. :ermm:Quote:
Originally Posted by vidcc
:happy:Quote:
Originally Posted by Everose
Indeed.Quote:
Originally Posted by Busyman
Not a bible quote that is it.?Quote:
Originally Posted by Everose
Oh i agree he has no gripes... do the crime do the time... perhaps they should look into a coercion charge for god ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by Busyman
This is as dumb as the McDonald's lawsuits.Quote:
Originally Posted by vidcc
Sorry vid this is stupid and cut and dry.