Theory?Quote:
Originally Posted by vidcc
What theory? :huh:
Printable View
Theory?Quote:
Originally Posted by vidcc
What theory? :huh:
the way to get equality/acceptance is to avoid highlighting the differences.Quote:
Originally Posted by j2k4
I don't follow...do you posit that highlighting the differences between the sexes grants her the exception to berate Zed for his "lack of accomplishment", but, if the roles were reversed, this would be forbidden?Quote:
Originally Posted by vidcc
If the roles were reversed, I'd think him a cad for behaving so loutishly, but in order to preserve the "differences", we should overlook her making such a comment?
Is this another example of the liberal propensity for "reparations"?
I call "bullshit". ;)
Nothing to do with her talking and everything to do with her thrusting her breast out and pouting like a bimbo (or whore as the old fashion "mens club" calls them)
This is a theory?Quote:
Originally Posted by vidcc
Of mine?
WTF are you on about?
Harris wants to be taken seriously..agree?Quote:
Originally Posted by j2k4
Now I admit that she would deny being a feminist as the right wing like to portray them but the fact that she runs for office makes her a believer in equality by default.
I dunno vid, the look on Katherine Harris' face, the way she was talking, and the turning of those big bressessus ready to burst out that tired grey suit with every delicious syllable tells me that she wanted to fuck.
I could be wrong. :idunno:
Oh and about feminism...
I know when I get home from work my bitch better have a warm plate of food on the table and afterwards have her legs open ready to receive me.
I'm so understanding.
So you're down to 30lbs and masturbate a lot then.......:lol: :lol:Quote:
Originally Posted by Busyman
:lol: :lol: :lol: Good one!!!Quote:
Originally Posted by vidcc
I'm sure the gay and feminist lobbies would appreciate the comparison, but it's a bit of a stretch here.Quote:
Originally Posted by vidcc
Katherine Harris probably assumes she can do the job, that is why she aspires to reach higher, but whether she does so out of an allegiance to other women is a matter of fit and form, don't you think?
By your reasoning, Kay Bailey Hutchison, Elizabeth Dole, Condoleezza Rice, hell, even Margaret Thatcher are feminists.
By my reasoning, such women achieve high station by eschewing the requisite feminist idea, rhetoric and compulsion to get ahead by continuously (and mainly) stating all men are assholes.
See the difference?