South Dakota Bans Abortion..Oh Wait

[QUOTE=Biggles][QUOTE=Tempestv]

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Biggles

Does anybody actually live in S. Dakota?

Or Canada?

The numbers involved are hardly huge. Is this some sort of stalking horse to raise the debate elsewhere or will it simply be ignored in the more populated States?

---

It goes against McCorvey Vs. Wade. They want the issue brought up again to the Supreme Court since there are now more conservative justices.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Tempestv

I am right next door to SD Biggles.

what does the law say about women that go to another state to have an abortion? are there going to be women coming over this way to get an abortion in Montana?

I gotta agree with Busyman, the whole idea is stupid. Everything you've said about this is making sense.

---

I think she has to have an abortion in state for it to be a crime.

Otherwise, that's another can of worms. They'll have to prove the conception was in state.:lol: :lol:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Busyman

Prove that a fertilized egg can survive outside the womb.

---

Prove a newborn can survive outside the womb, absent a nurturer.

Practically speaking (I assume that is your aim), there is no difference whatsoever.

You can't draw the line there, either.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by j2k4

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Busyman

Prove that a fertilized egg can survive outside the womb.

---

Prove a newborn can survive outside the womb, absent a nurturer.

Practically speaking (I assume that is your aim), there is no difference whatsoever.

You can't draw the line there, either.

---

Eh?:huh: Very flawed. Did you read everything?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Busyman

2. Prove that a fertilized egg can survive outside the womb.
If not (3)...
If so (4)...

3. It cannot be deemed separate from the mother...not a person.

4. Then government should use an apparatus to bring it to term themselves.

---

The nurturer doesn't have to be the mother either....unless you force her, but we can't do that now can we?

I know you are pro life but in what instances would you want abortion allowed?

To be honest busy I think kev. is reasonable on the actual abortion part of the issue even though I don't agree with his "let people of individual states decide what women can and can't do in their neighbourhood" belief.
My view is that it is and should only be a private issue between the woman and her doctor and depending on circumstances the father. There should be no ban but term limits other than for health reasons shouldn't be objectionable to any reasonable person.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by vidcc

To be honest busy I think kev. is reasonable on the actual abortion part of the issue even though I don't agree with his "let people of individual states decide what women can and can't do in their neighbourhood" belief.
My view is that it is and should only be a private issue between the woman and her doctor and depending on circumstances the father. There should be no ban but term limits other than for health reasons shouldn't be objectionable to any reasonable person.

---

My question to Kev has nothing to do with state's decision making though. My question goes past political mumbojumbo. It is direct.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Busyman

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by vidcc

To be honest busy I think kev. is reasonable on the actual abortion part of the issue even though I don't agree with his "let people of individual states decide what women can and can't do in their neighbourhood" belief.
My view is that it is and should only be a private issue between the woman and her doctor and depending on circumstances the father. There should be no ban but term limits other than for health reasons shouldn't be objectionable to any reasonable person.

---

My question to Kev has nothing to do with state's decision making though. My question goes past political mumbojumbo. It is direct.

---

I'm off to work ATM.

I'll nuke you later.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by j2k4

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Busyman

My question to Kev has nothing to do with state's decision making though. My question goes past political mumbojumbo. It is direct.

---

I'm off to work ATM.

I'll nuke you later.

---

It's a simple question.

Rock on South Dakota!

Babies 1, Murderers 0.

@ Busyman: Get a womb or get a life.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ava Estelle

Rock on South Dakota!

Babies 1, Murderers 0.

@ Busyman: Get a womb or get a life.

---

You don't read well, Billy.

Fed > State

Oh and Billy, suck ass.