Gee, a mere handful of posts into the thread, and already you've retreated to "...a few months is pretty accurate..."Quote:
Originally Posted by GepperRankins
To a conspiracy theorist, I'm quite sure that's good enough, eh?
Printable View
Gee, a mere handful of posts into the thread, and already you've retreated to "...a few months is pretty accurate..."Quote:
Originally Posted by GepperRankins
To a conspiracy theorist, I'm quite sure that's good enough, eh?
"retreated" would suggest that i made an argument, was given something to suggest my argument is invalid, then i tried to obfuscate.Quote:
Originally Posted by j2k4Gee, a mere handful of posts into the thread, and already you've retreated to "...a few months is pretty accurate..."Quote:
Originally Posted by GepperRankins
To a conspiracy theorist, I'm quite sure that's good enough, eh?
i didn't though. i think for a guy to describe something almost incomprehensible and say it'll happen within a few of months, and it happens. is accurate.
if a conspiracy theory exists it means the goal was achieved.
Just so-Quote:
Originally Posted by 100%
Since conspiracy theorists get a pass on any reasonable standard of accuracy, they can never be proved wrong.
Well done, Zed. :)
sorry. i just woke up. what are you two talking about?
the conspiracy theory exists because the official story is unrealistic. the official story is weak but it gets protected by shame and disbelief
The 'official' story is weaker than your conspiracy-theory"? :blink:Quote:
Originally Posted by GepperRankins
Tell me then, The-
You think London and Madrid were conspiracies, too?
Have you a supporting cast in the British and Spanish governments as well?
Conspiracy websites refuting the 'official' stories?
This is critical to your theory, you see...:whistling
London and Madrid were actually provoked by the west. They were response to the Iraq war.Quote:
Originally Posted by j2k4The 'official' story is weaker than your conspiracy-theory"? :blink:Quote:
Originally Posted by GepperRankins
Tell me then, The-
You think London and Madrid were conspiracies, too?
Have you a supporting cast in the British and Spanish governments as well?
Conspiracy websites refuting the 'official' stories?
This is critical to your theory, you see...:whistling
There was no reason for Al-Qaeda and Bin Laden to attack the US on September 11th. They denied all knowledge for a good while until "Bin Laden" eventually said he did it.
It would have been obvious to anyone that if you do this, America would come and kick your arse.
I heard that in afghanistan they have besides oil also a lot of opium seed which its twice as much as before the war, bush knows why they are there. I said it from the start and still think that usa planned the attack on world trade center soo they can attack iraq. Weapons for mass destruction arn't in the hands of poor ppl. Every war is about money and power. Bin Laden is just one of CIA puppets. Same old story all over again, like with kennedy, but i find it interesting how ppl still belive kennedy was a nice guy as the same they still think about bush. When u murder somebody u are a killer but if u go and kill thousands when you have power its not, thats whats war all about.
Oh, you mean like we're doing now?Quote:
Originally Posted by GepperRankins
America is afraid to "kick" anyone's "arse".
I'm beginning to think we've have to be nuked before we'd could 'justify' that.
it's kinda sad that you should see that i just made three practically irrefutable statements and rather than take any notice, you;Quote:
Originally Posted by j2k4Oh, you mean like we're doing now?Quote:
Originally Posted by GepperRankins
America is afraid to "kick" anyone's "arse".
I'm beginning to think we've have to be nuked before we'd could 'justify' that.
1 - ignore the second sentence, even though you quoted it.
2 - remove the second statement completely because it's impossible to twist.
3 - i think most people would consider "shock-and-awe" and having you government decimated as getting your arse kicked.