Unless you're doing Graphic design or gaming, I think that anyhting more than 1280x960 is overkill.
Then again, Quake running in 1600x1200 is rather impressive-looking...
Printable View
Unless you're doing Graphic design or gaming, I think that anyhting more than 1280x960 is overkill.
Then again, Quake running in 1600x1200 is rather impressive-looking...
I've got a 17" pile of pants.But does the job for now.
Ive just realised I still use a 15" CRT, only capable of res up to 1024x768.
Had the same one for years, only upgrade the base unit.
Samung 900NF.
19" Aperture Grille.
Natural Flat tube
up to 2048x1536
hmmmmmm....i want your monitor to have my babiesQuote:
Originally posted by Somebody1234@13 May 2003 - 15:28
Samung 900NF.
19" Aperture Grille.
Natural Flat tube
up to 2048x1536
I have a Dell Dimesion 8200 with a 19" screen! :P
19 inches......oh monitor... :D
Sylvania F89 (19in.) at 1280x960. Highest res is 1600x1200.
It's not one of the more expensive ones, but I've had two Viewsonics and a Sony go bad on me. <_<
Never had one single problem with this monitor.
Yet. :unsure:
Hewlett Packard HP70 17"
Highest res veiwable is 1024x768 @ 85hertz, the res goes higher but the screen goes funny.
I bought this secondhand for £80, was i ripped off cos i know you can buy new monitors now for the same price.
32 inches of Samsung flat widecreen baby ,set at 1024 x 768