Yes, those of them at shitty sites who violate their users privacy have plenty to fear. Those of us who stick to places where staff respect their users dont have to worry about childish retaliation.Quote:
Originally Posted by josegavara
Printable View
Yes, those of them at shitty sites who violate their users privacy have plenty to fear. Those of us who stick to places where staff respect their users dont have to worry about childish retaliation.Quote:
Originally Posted by josegavara
whats childish about how they have retaliated ?what do you exspect ?them to let ppl have x amount of accounts?the reason they keep the details is so the slimeballs dont sign up again and try it on !which as stopped at lot of good users from joiningQuote:
Originally Posted by RoarkYes, those of them at shitty sites who violate their users privacy have plenty to fear. Those of us who stick to places where staff respect their users don\'t have to worry about childish retaliation.Quote:
Originally Posted by josegavara
I hear that. Instead of thinking about others a lot of people only thought about themselves.Quote:
Originally Posted by bunny67whats childish about how they have retaliated ?what do you exspect ?them to let ppl have x amount of accounts?the reason they keep the details is so the slimeballs dont sign up again and try it on !which as stopped at lot of good users from joiningQuote:
Originally Posted by Roark
I meant sharing account details given in confidence. Especially since as many of us know, the trackers are hardly infallible in id\'ing traders/cheats.Quote:
Originally Posted by bunny67whats childish about how they have retaliated ?what do you exspect ?them to let ppl have x amount of accounts?the reason they keep the details is so the slimeballs dont sign up again and try it on !which as stopped at lot of good users from joiningQuote:
Originally Posted by Roark
Roark, you probably meant to say: recently banned revolt users don't have to fear their accounts on trackers that don't care if their members are quite possibly trading their accounts or having dupes. I believe it is in the interest of every single tracker to keep a somewhat fair community - and surprise, some tracker-staff take that seriously.
On the other hand it might just be a little bit harsh to lose a couple of accounts because of one indescretion but in all fairness: if you do it once who will believe you to stop with it?
In a totally unrelated matter: while revolt is not the uber-leet-special place I've come to think about, after all it was a much wanted forum/tracker and I seem to have drawn my own wrong conclusions , it does seem to be a cozy place with a decent and friendly community you don't experience every other day. I'll keep visiting, thanks to revolt for this chance :)
It's nice to hear that some sites like to be the judge, jury and executioner. I'm sure that a lot of those people who got banned were traders or dupe accounts, but it wouldn't surprise me if some were innocent. And now they lose all their good accounts? I think I won't try to sign up next time then (I missed last time) for fear I will be executed by their staff, even though I of course would only sign up once and not trade it.
Well then you've got nothing to worry about :)Quote:
Originally Posted by fstemon
Right, because tracker staff have an excellent track record of never screwing up /sarcasm <br \\>Quote:
Originally Posted by KirsteinWell then you\'ve got nothing to worry about http://filesharingtalk.com/vb3/Quote:
Originally Posted by fstemon
<br \\>
By the way, I have this bridge in Brooklyn that I\'m looking to sell ...
then why not jump off it instead:lol:Quote:
Originally Posted by RoarkRight, because tracker staff have an excellent track record of never screwing up /sarcasm <br \\>Quote:
Originally Posted by Kirstein
<br \\>
By the way, I have this bridge in Brooklyn that I\'m looking to sell ...
its rich aint it. we have to treat everything in confidence whilst they trade our accounts. is it me or does anyone else see how silly that makes the poster look.