Isnt this hypocrisy?

Well sure trading is gay but that doesn't mean that your statement is hypocritical. Sure if one trades an invite then they are trading it to one person they will trust, they feel the made a trade with someone they know a bit about and hopefully have done some research on the person until they feel comfortable with the trade that they will not lose further invites. Now if the person they trade the invite to then goes ahead and trades that acct again without doing the proper research and trades it to someone else who isn't a trustworthy trader ( there is such a thing before someone starts ) then the first person who thought he made a good low risk trade has now been held accountable for a person he has no agreement with or may not even know. So it's full understandable from the traders point of view why he/she would not want this to go on.

By definition, an individual needs to pretend to have a certain system of beliefs which he/she does not actually have in order to be considered hypocritical. Most traders believe that it is within the rights of an individual to trade an account he/she got from another individual. If that is a principle within the belief system of the average trader, then he must accept the fact that some other trader may feel the same way and attempt to trade an account given to him by the first one, otherwise he would be contradicting his own system of beliefs, therefor acting hypocritically.

This, of course, is a totally theoretical question, as I doubt any trader will feel hypocritical about making such an odd request. I also doubt traders will even bother reading this thread.

Having said that, I do believe they are so very :ghey:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SgtMajor

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by p1r4t3

Traders trade accounts,and invites, and yet when they give away an invite or account, they want people not to trade their invites/accounts...

Isn't it hypocrisy?

---

Of course not, you wouldn't like to see your tree banned for what happens underneath you would you?, oh, wait a minute, they are not in your tree, they are in some random users tree with some name no-one has ever heard of and the inviter of that invited account has no idea what is going on underneath him! Poor soul.

"Hi everyone, it's John here"

"But your nick says ladyboy!!??"

"Oh yes, yes it does, I forgot, I suffer from a multiple personality disorder and have an identity crisis on trackers, so don't worry"

---

:Drofl

NO!

:ghey:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Detale

Well sure trading is gay but that doesn't mean that your statement is hypocritical. Sure if one trades an invite then they are trading it to one person they will trust, they feel the made a trade with someone they know a bit about and hopefully have done some research on the person until they feel comfortable with the trade that they will not lose further invites. Now if the person they trade the invite to then goes ahead and trades that acct again without doing the proper research and trades it to someone else who isn't a trustworthy trader ( there is such a thing before someone starts ) then the first person who thought he made a good low risk trade has now been held accountable for a person he has no agreement with or may not even know. So it's full understandable from the traders point of view why he/she would not want this to go on.

---

U and I both know if it was based on trust, there would be no real need for trade at all.. people could just give each other invites......

Yes. Hypocracy FTW¬!

I don't trade at all :) Trading their own accounts (got from open signups) is better than trading accounts got from an invite which really gets the inviter into trouble

Obviousment. YES.

better than that, trading gets the tracker itself in trouble. Ever thought that? nitwits :-/

lol'ing your sig benchez :)