Re: People, you know this; Invite rarity ratings royally screw things up.
Don't get rid of the level system! That would make me look like an idiot for paying $25 for a ftn invite.
Re: People, you know this; Invite rarity ratings royally screw things up.
Don't get rid of the level system! That would make me look like an idiot for paying $25 for a ftn invite.
Re: People, you know this; Invite rarity ratings royally screw things up.
jam0980tr: http://img170.imageshack.us/img170/2...ntspeedpx1.png
TWO DOWNLOAD SPEED ?????!!??!
SOMETHING FISHY HERE.
AND AS FOR THE RARITY THINGY IT SUCKS.
TORRENTLEECH IS NO.1. NO MATTER WHAT. :-D
Re: People, you know this; Invite rarity ratings royally screw things up.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
gnlstryker
friend there is nuffin fishy, am fresh lol
I made 2 boxs becoz i love my mark and i removed my upload boxs and added the download boxs hehehe
when i look at that mark it gives me a nices Feeling of what my server can do!! what setting to use, if you wanna see how i did it look up on my post reply ;) its all there the tips how i did it :P
Re: People, you know this; Invite rarity ratings royally screw things up.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
pandabear
Don't get rid of the level system! That would make me look like an idiot for paying $25 for a ftn invite.
:D
Re: People, you know this; Invite rarity ratings royally screw things up.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
pandabear
Don't get rid of the level system! That would make me look like an idiot for paying $25 for a ftn invite.
Do u mean SCT?
Re: People, you know this; Invite rarity ratings royally screw things up.
Re: People, you know this; Invite rarity ratings royally screw things up.
What? Nobody would know what invite to accept or site to signup too. Personally i think FST has a lot of info n members in all the tracks, that give feedback(as we see), people would be signing up to fake sites-ect. I look @ it for what it is, nt 2 hard to understand. I do not want to accept a invite from someone if i do not know what the site contains, if i don't like it then i would be put in a bad situation. Good job w- the people who make that list...
Re: People, you know this; Invite rarity ratings royally screw things up.
listen rare is very important if u look at what's up with oink for exemple.
i like the rare ones couse the risk of them being raided is much lower
then tl/revtt for exemple.. if its hard for me to join them its hard for
the authorities too and u cant stop them if u cant prove what they are doing :)
Re: People, you know this; Invite rarity ratings royally screw things up.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
pone44
What? Nobody would know what invite to accept or site to signup too. Personally i think FST has a lot of info n members in all the tracks, that give feedback(as we see), people would be signing up to fake sites-ect. I look @ it for what it is, nt 2 hard to understand. I do not want to accept a invite from someone if i do not know what the site contains, if i don't like it then i would be put in a bad situation. Good job w- the people who make that list...
what your talking about here m8 is the review system... which has nothing to do with the lvl system..
lvl system is based and judged solely by the availablity of invites vs the chances of you getting in..
the tracker reviews is where you can go and check out the info on sites , member comments, see SS of catagories, ect... two totaly different things...
that list has no value except to traders.... which makes it difficult for peeps to get in and members.. good members. it makes most think that they have to horde invites and collect as many sites as possible... then they believe they have bartering chips to trade off later...
lame and stupid.... but anyways...
REGUARDS
Quote:
Originally Posted by
DrParker
listen rare is very important if u look at what's up with oink for exemple.
i like the rare ones couse the risk of them being raided is much lower
then tl/revtt for exemple.. if its hard for me to join them its hard for
the authorities too and u cant stop them if u cant prove what they are doing :)
that theory is very flawed...... "RARE" tracker are just as much at risk as lets say TL.... just that the authorities would rather go after the big fish first to make examples...... :frusty: