Now then, not too much serious discussion. This thread can include Biden's gaffes too :happy:
Printable View
Now then, not too much serious discussion. This thread can include Biden's gaffes too :happy:
They will get follow ups. Two minutes for each question. They also will not have 2 minute responses, rather 90 sec responses.
Anyhow, I don't have my own debates on who will "win" until I've actually witnessed the debate itself and know what I'm talking about. Talk is cheap.
Should be interesting...
Do the candidates use teleprompters?
I'm voting for her and McCain based on educated decisions I believe they will make behind closed doors. I know that she is a good public speaker, but has been caught off guard recently on newer topics to her.
I won't deny her inexperience in select areas, and never have. However, I think it needs to be looked at in perspective, whereas many out there push it as a blanket issue.
Partisan issues completely aside, I find Obamas situation of inexperience to be a far more pressing matter. All that inexperience could be elected to the Oval Office next month.
Public speaking ability is like #94 on my list of necessary credentials. More like a bonus, even.
But more than anything, I'll be voting for them because their core beliefs are closer to mine. They'll be approving bills which are far closer to my beliefs than the opposition, or vetoing them respectively.
I watch the debates, but they hold little importance to me and likely most others unless they're on the fence.
If John McCain is elected, he will be the oldest newly elected president - ever. Do you really believe that Palin is ready to lead, if something would happen to McCain?
-bd
No, but McCain has also been given a clean bill of health so I don't see that as an immediate issue.