Quote:
Originally posted by samsamsamsam@6 September 2003 - 20:44
I can see that removing sources would help as redundant ones will no longer be checked out when downloading so it cuts down on that activity. As far as the <not stored> sources, I had guessed that whilst the IP+node were stored, KDat hadn't stored the name (so only the name wasn't stored). This may be due to the DAT file only supposed to hold about 30 sources (although can be tweaked in K++) and supports only 30 name entries whilst other details are added.
When downloading, is it that the "no-name" sources are not connecting or that when connected, there name is available so what looks like a"no-name" not connecting followed by a "named source" connecting is just the same source (although sometimes they would simply just not be available)?
Is it better to just delete the lowest bandwidth sources?
Feeling dizzy after that!
Although i am new to using k-dat i deleted the lowest bandwidth sources and the no-named sources and for me it had a dramatic affect on my slow moving downloads. 1 in particular i have been waiting for a month. Longest i have ever waited for a file. Then following the advice on this topic what do you know it started to download very fast (ex. moving at 0.50kps for the last month on average and then after following the advice was downloading at over 40kps). I hope this helps you.