Printable View
If you prefer lossy music then What is probably the way to go. I like proper lossless, so I need all of them, but it's on Waffles that I'm most active, both tracker and site wise.
As for which are my preferred I'd say Waffles>Pedro's>E>What (But again that's because I want proper lossless)
yes you are right and I edited my post to reflect that. I, for some reason unknown to me, thought that there was more users at what than there actually was. Honest mistake.Quote:
Originally Posted by TheGood
Your math is off.Quote:
Originally Posted by ben99
I have all three and prefer What.cd over any of the others. It has a great layout and is very easy to navigate and search. Not to mention the enormous selection.
Waffles would be at the bottom of the list for me. Far too many FLAC albums which don't cut the mustard, as well as a cluttered layout that can make searching for an individual MP3 album a tedious and time consuming task.
E**** can be a great source, but not at all if you're only into modern music. If modern stuff is your preference, skip E**** altogether. I like it for all the classic rock, myself. Of you're into Jazz or classical, there is also a lot in those categories to offer as well.
Waffles is the best(layout is awesome)
E**** is good if you like old stuff/flac formatbut i like Pedro's BT better.
whatcd is good (hate the site format)
Side note i do like E**** for there forum invite request to other trackers no scamming there:happy:
Waffles wins my vote.:D
what's so difficult about searching on waffles?Quote:
Originally Posted by Skizo
It isn't "difficult", persay; just unorganized.Quote:
Originally Posted by TheGoodwhat's so difficult about searching on waffles?Quote:
Originally Posted by Skizo
For example: I was looking for a Cross Canadian Ragweed album the other day but didn't know the name. I went to What.cd and located the album straight away by simply putting the artists name in the "Artist" search box. All albums were listed chronologically and every file type and quality was listed with respect each album, so I didn't have to search for what quality options were available. It was quick, easy, and all right in front of me.
http://img129.imageshack.us/img129/8766/whatwu4.th.jpghttp://img129.imageshack.us/images/thpix.gif
With Waffles, the only option is to search key words. By searching the artists name again, I get a variety of results. Those results are not in chronological order, album order, nor any other distinguishable order whatsoever, thus I am forced to read every single torrent name until I find what I'm looking for.
http://img379.imageshack.us/img379/7...flesko7.th.jpghttp://img379.imageshack.us/images/thpix.gif
Now take that Cross Canadian Ragweed is not even a group that most people have ever heard of. Try searching for a mainstream band like Metallica that turns up hundreds of results and try finding a torrent that you're looking for by reading an arbitrary list of torrent names. Now, again, compare that to What.cd where there is a perfect listing of torrents.
There really is no comparison.
what.cd is where its at. no one leeches at waffles unless its FL
Don't know where people claiming waffles has more FLAC than what get their stats
51544 from waffles verses 72986 from what
And last waffles FL, I tried to replace some albums that I didn't have in FLAC with FLAC. I found most were poorly seeded if at all.
What tops in quantity, BT in quality, waffles is in the middle between those two. Not a member at E**** so can't compare it.
i don't have music tracker but a while ago luckly i had an invite for what.cd,
just one night i surfed in it and honestly i should admit that it was wonderful as i see.
but i am angry with them because they disabled my acc. without using it.