Printable View
Quote:
Originally posted by SnnY@18 September 2003 - 17:48
This is an astounding leap forward in pedagogical theory, mark my word!
Let's do away with schooling all together while we're at at it. :D
i agree SnnY :D - i hope they come up with a similar theory with numbers :)
It looks as if you have already done that today Snny! :P
nah i done away with sleep instead.
Icx ant spell spomretimes.
is it - antidisestablishmentariasim? not spelt right i dont think!! :DQuote:
Originally posted by Lamsey@18 September 2003 - 18:26
bet you can't work out atiinaaidrbstlnhatsneemism... http://www.mcbriens.net/liam/img/smilies/tongue.gif
Really surprised it works - shame they can't work out a way for you to be able to read everyones handwriting!! :lol:
lol I heard that the other day at college off of some stoner and I thought he was talking crazy stoned talk...but then I reliased im fluent in that as it is B)
im arfiad to use tihs wtih nb00s wehn tehy psot tiehr qiotsunes :lol: :lol:
btw, iv seen tihs bfroee yet it was a lttlie pgrroam taht deos the smae.
wrkos cxnoett are aaptccblee slruey rutless when the pdcueros this only wdros are in teakn.
Just thought I would try to see if this works. I am less than convinced. Could someone possibly tell me.
Do you mean if the words are in grammatical order JP?