Is "Whom" still legal?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Artemis

Yet another word that has fallen into fogeyness is thus, it is only brandished by university lecturers. A little used word that I particularly enjoy though is underwhelm(ed), as in I am completely underwhelmed by that :blink:

---

Oh I like those. I use the phrase 'multi-talentless' sometimes. I use 'thus' quite a lot as well. But usually I find old fashioned words work better banged right up next to really modern words or slang, just for effect.

Not that I really think about it much :unsure:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by chalice

I would still use 'whom' sometimes, like.

When I'm addressing a letter to a collective body or if I'm writing a sicknote for one of the kids for school or whatnot.

'To whom it may concern'. Still valid imo. True story.

It's also the sound a fart makes underwater. WHOOOM.

---

No, that's 'Blubbalubbalub'. WHOOM is the noise a torpedo makes leaving a sub.

EHS

(second thoughts maybe yours does sound like that)

Guinness'll do that to ya.

And you definitely wouldn't be eating that soggy biscuit after that. :no:

Oh no! Soda Stream squits are the worst.

I like using 'ergo'. It makes me seem clever. Or a twat. Either.

You like to use a twat for what? :unsure:

Getting a new pair of shoes, mainly.

:lol:

It is our way, I'm not judging.

Is the use of "proper english" the correct English Grammer?

I think it is, but it sounds wrong.. :unsure:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Rat Faced

Is the use of "proper english" the correct English Grammer?

I think it is, but it sounds wrong.. :unsure:

---

The Queen's english or proper english, which of course begs the burning question is text speak 'improper english' ? :blink: