Thread Count

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Sanka113

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Chewie

Are you suggesting that a long standing member who posts irregularly but eruditely should be considered less of an asset to FST than a numpty that posts nice ga or good luck all over the place?

---

No I think someone who has been using the forum recently is should be valued more than someone who use to post several years ago and merely is a lurker now. Looks like 250 post is the requirement to get in now anyways.

---

Why even care who can get in and who can't. As long as they behave they can stay, right?

I sense some ''don't-let-noobs-in-elite-forum'' from some users.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by KFlint

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by apextwin146

It can be easily configured to ignore those threads if thats the case ..

---

No, it isn't. But like T.S.O.L told you, it's not a good idea anyway.

Some excellent members never even started a single thread.

---

No as in like it would be really be a really complex task to disable the thread count in the previously mentioned sub sections or NO like the idea isnt that convincing ..

Probably not a really complex task coding wise, but the actual requirements are ok to start with and see if there is an interest.