Printable View
AT least 3/4 of those have 'already been done', but obviously not to the BD25-style standards that Lepgek proposes. Hopefully, captions/commentaries won't be stripped out, etc., and the main audio translated into DTS. Most I'll bet have the main movie <25GB, so it's all VERY doable.
Example in the other thread, btw.
I'd like to request that if you do recompress the video, if even just a tiny little bit, that it is mentioned in the nfo.
I personally like the current crop of remuxed blu-rays where the video is completely untouched and the HD audio is left intact and untouched too.
I store all my file on hard disc so I much MUCH prefer to have it all untouched.
As for which off your list - A Bug's Life for me (well, my son actually)
Cheers,
Moley
I hope you aren't talking about the dim folks who don't understand that the DTS-MA (which they include) 'core' can be be played by any standard DTS decoder, so they use up bits for a DTS 'recode' (at 1.536Mb/s), then strip out the low-bit-rate commentary track(s).Quote:
Originally Posted by moleyman69
Personally, for my situation, that doesn't bother me, as all my files are stored on hard disc. So long as the video and HD audio is left intact and untouched, that's all I'm worried about. In fact, I often remux the files again to removed the extra DTS-only/commentary tracks that they leave in.
For me, it's all about the quality :-)