Yup, uharc is the best. I compressed 2 gigs of stuff into about 708 mb, just big enough to do an overburn.
Printable View
Yup, uharc is the best. I compressed 2 gigs of stuff into about 708 mb, just big enough to do an overburn.
you are welcome agent smith http://smilies.sofrayt.com/%5E/b/smiley2k.gif
Wow I gotta try UHARC...Quote:
Originally posted by Xilo@11 October 2003 - 20:50
Yup, uharc is the best. I compressed 2 gigs of stuff into about 708 mb, just big enough to do an overburn.
Wow I gotta try UHARC... [/b][/quote]Quote:
Originally posted by KrackHead2k+11 October 2003 - 21:04--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (KrackHead2k @ 11 October 2003 - 21:04)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-Xilo@11 October 2003 - 20:50
Yup, uharc is the best. I compressed 2 gigs of stuff into about 708 mb, just big enough to do an overburn.
Its takes a long time to compress thats the only downside about it. ;)
Its takes a long time to compress thats the only downside about it. ;) [/b][/quote]Quote:
Originally posted by Agent Smith+11 October 2003 - 21:11--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Agent Smith @ 11 October 2003 - 21:11)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'>Quote:
Originally posted by KrackHead2k@11 October 2003 - 21:04
<!--QuoteBegin-Xilo
Quote:
@11 October 2003 - 20:50
Yup, uharc is the best. I compressed 2 gigs of stuff into about 708 mb, just big enough to do an overburn.
Wow I gotta try UHARC...
Damn, I'm guessing it takes a long time to extract the files also. :unsure:
Na, takes maybe 20 minutes to extract. Though it took forever to compress...
WinRAR!
YEp fast and does the job right.http://smilies.sofrayt.com/%5E/2/salook.gifQuote:
Originally posted by Kunal@12 October 2003 - 03:37
WinRAR!