Just like when I buy a lotto ticket- only one number for me. Maybe I'll get another chance when the sequel comes out. :P
Printable View
Just like when I buy a lotto ticket- only one number for me. Maybe I'll get another chance when the sequel comes out. :P
Quote:
Originally Posted by tehjew
This just seems so vindictive. Box office numbers are still rising, don't blame pirating for people not coming out to your movie.
I'm assuming you already know this, but I'll mention it just in case. The IP you listed is a private address, so it won't be the address you should be looking for on the list.Quote:
Originally Posted by unclemilty74
Umm, that's not pirvate, as far as I know that's Linkys standard address to access there routers :lol:
Was the big "HAHA!" was your first clue?Quote:
Originally Posted by tehjew
I dl'd it in 1080p, will they sue me too?
A user might have to pay $2,500 for a single movie download? That's interesting. I'm assuming the movie was tracked from a 'public' tracker instead of a 'private' tracker.
...and thats what private tracker are for :)
related;
Quote:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/10322825.stm
USCG acknowledged on its website that many people will not have the financial clout to pursue cases.
"As a practical matter each individual infringer lacks the assets, net worth and earning capacity to make civil prosecution practical," it said.
EFF alongside ACLU has asked the judges in the cases to cancel court summons against those accused.
Judges involved in the case have asked USCG to explain why it has brought together so many people together in one lawsuit.
It has until 30 June to explain why it is pursuing cases in this manner.